Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31560095›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2019

Newer Treatment Approaches in Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.

Gabrielle Macaron, Jenny Feng, Manikum Moodley, Mary Rensel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pediatric multiple sclerosis: Improving outcome through high-efficacy therapies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The State of the Art of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Economic and Humanistic Burden of Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabrielle MacaronMellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Av. U-10, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Jenny FengMellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Av. U-10, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Manikum MoodleyCenter for Pediatric Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mary RenselMellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Av. U-10, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. renselm@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWith the recognition that pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is characterized by more prominent disease activity, earlier age at onset of disability milestones, and more prominent cognitive impairment compared with physical disability earlier in the disease course compared with adult-onset multiple sclerosis (AOMS), there has been increasing interest in identifying optimal and safe treatment approaches to achieve better disease control in this group. Injectable therapies have been traditionally used as first line in this population, although not formally approved. This review focuses on current treatment and monitoring approaches in POMS. RECENT

findingsIn the past few years, and despite the paucity of FDA-approved medications for use in POMS, an increasing trend toward using newer disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in this group is observed. However, escalation (as opposed to induction) remains the most frequent approach, and many children continue to be untreated before age 18, particularly before age 12. The only FDA- and EMA-approved disease-modifying therapy in POMS is fingolimod; however, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, and alemtuzumab either have been evaluated in observational studies or are being currently investigated in formal randomized controlled trials for use in POMS and appear to be safe in this group. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has also been evaluated in a small series. Clinical outcome measures and MS biomarkers have been poorly studied in POMS; however, the use of composite functional scores, neurofilament light chain, optical coherence tomography, and imaging findings is being increasingly investigated to improve early diagnosis and efficient monitoring of POMS. Off-label use of newer DMTs in POMS is increasing, and based on retrospective data, and phase 2 trials, this approach appears to be safe in children. Results from ongoing trials will help clarify the safety and efficacy of these therapies in the future. Fingolimod is the only FDA-approved medication for use in POMS. Outcome measures and biomarkers used in AOMS are being studied in POMS and are greatly needed to quantify treatment response in this group.

Indexed as

EfficacyMultiple sclerosisOutcome measuresPediatricSafetyTreatment

Identifiers

PMID31560095
OpenAlexW2976512501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.