Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31560093›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2020

Perceptions of Community and Clinic-Based Adherence Clubs for Patients Stable on Antiretroviral Treatment: A Mixed Methods Study.

Mutsa Mudavanhu, Nora S West, Sheree R Schwartz, Lillian Mutunga, Valerie Keyser, Jean Bassett, Annelies Van Rie, Colleen F Hanrahan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mutsa MudavanhuWitkoppen Health and Welfare Centre, Fourways, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Nora S WestDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sheree R SchwartzDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Lillian MutungaWitkoppen Health and Welfare Centre, Fourways, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Valerie KeyserWitkoppen Health and Welfare Centre, Fourways, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jean BassettWitkoppen Health and Welfare Centre, Fourways, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Annelies Van RieEpidemiology for Global Health Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Colleen F HanrahanDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. chanrah1@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4544-4591

Funding

Global Mental Health Training ProgramT32MH103210 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Judith Karen Bass, Sarah Sutherlin-McIvor Murray · 2015 to 2026
$4.0M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH103210United States Agency for International Development AID-674-A-12-00033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adherence clubs for patients stable on antiretroviral treatment (ART) offer decongestion of clinics and task-shifting, improved adherence and retention in care. Findings on patient acceptability by club location (in the clinic vs. the community) are limited. This was a mixed-methods study set within a randomized controlled trial of community versus clinic-based adherence clubs for retention in care at Witkoppen Health and Welfare Centre in Johannesburg, South Africa. Participants were surveyed on preferences for adherence club-based care (e.g. location, convenience). We conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) with 36 participants, and surveyed 568 participants: 49% in community-based clubs and 51% in clinic-based clubs. Participants in both arms favorably rated adherence clubs. Almost all (95%) in clinic-based clubs would recommend them to a friend, while fewer (88% in community-based club participants would do so (p = 0.004). Participants found clubs promoted social support, and were convenient and time-saving, though concerns around stigma and access to other health care were noted within community-based clubs. Adherence clubs are a highly acceptable form of differentiated care for stable ART patients. These data indicate that clinic-based clubs may be preferred above community-based clubs, potentially for reasons of stigma and access to additional health care services.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsMedication AdherenceAnti-Retroviral AgentsHumansPeer GroupRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSouth AfricaAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsAdherence clubsHIVMixed methodsRetention in careSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID31560093
PMCPMC9933863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.