Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31560049›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2020

Multicenter Study of the Accuracy of the BD MAX Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis Assay for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex and Mutations Associated With Resistance to Rifampin and Isoniazid.

Maunank Shah, Sonia Paradis, Joshua Betz, Natalie Beylis, Renu Bharadwaj, Tatiana Caceres, Eduardo Gotuzzo, Moses Joloba, Vidya Mave, Lydia Nakiyingi and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prevalence and molecular characterization of drug-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Maunank ShahJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sonia ParadisBecton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, Maryland, USA.
Joshua BetzJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Natalie BeylisDivision of Medical Microbiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Renu BharadwajByramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College, Johns Hopkins University Clinical Research Site, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Tatiana CaceresInstituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Eduardo GotuzzoInstituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Moses JolobaInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Vidya MaveJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Lydia NakiyingiInfectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Mark P NicolDivision of Medical Microbiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Neeta PradhanByramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College, Johns Hopkins University Clinical Research Site, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Bonnie KingJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Derek ArmstrongJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Deborah KnechtBecton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, Maryland, USA.
Courtney E MausBecton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, Maryland, USA.
Charles K CooperBecton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, Maryland, USA.
Susan E DormanMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Yukari C ManabeJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Becton Dickinson (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USGovernment Medical College · INInfectious Diseases Institute · UGUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEGroote Schuur Hospital · ZAJohns Hopkins Medicine · USMakerere University · UGMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

HIV Co-infections in Uganda: TB, Cryptococcus, and Viral Hepatitis.D43TW009771 · FIC · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CASTELNUOVO, BARBARA, KAMBUGU, ANDREW DDUNGU · 2014 to 2023
$3.3M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) control is hindered by absence of rapid tests to identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and detect isoniazid (INH) and rifampin (RIF) resistance. We evaluated the accuracy of the BD MAX multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB assay (BD MAX) in South Africa, Uganda, India, and Peru.

methodsOutpatient adults with signs/symptoms of pulmonary TB were prospectively enrolled. Sputum smear microscopy and BD MAX were performed on a single raw sputum, which was then processed for culture and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST), BD MAX, and Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert).

results1053 participants with presumptive TB were enrolled (47% female; 32% with human immunodeficiency virus). In patients with confirmed TB, BD MAX sensitivity was 93% (262/282 [95% CI, 89-95%]); specificity was 97% (593/610 [96-98%]) among participants with negative cultures on raw sputa. BD MAX sensitivity was 100% (175/175 [98-100%]) for smear-positive samples (fluorescence microscopy), and 81% (87/107 [73-88%]) in smear-negative samples. Among participants with both BD MAX and Xpert, sensitivity was 91% (249/274 [87-94%]) for BD MAX and 90% (246/274 [86-93%]) for Xpert on processed sputa. Sensitivity and specificity for RIF resistance compared with phenotypic DST were 90% (9/10 [60-98%]) and 95% (211/222 [91-97%]), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of INH resistance were 82% (22/27 [63-92%]) and 100% (205/205 [98-100%]), respectively.

conclusionsThe BD MAX MDR-TB assay had high sensitivity and specificity for detection of MTB and RIF and INH drug resistance and may be an important tool for rapid detection of TB and MDR-TB globally.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAdultDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHumansIndiaIsoniazidMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationPeruRifampinSensitivity and SpecificitySouth AfricaSputumIsoniazidRifampindiagnosisHIVmultidrugMycobacterium infectionsresistancetuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID31560049
PMCPMC7442848
OpenAlexW2982824428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.