Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31559942›Full record

ArticleParasitology2020

Modulation of feed composition is able to make hens less attractive to the poultry red mite

Marine El Adouzi, Alfonsina Arriaga-Jiménez, Laurent Dormont, Nicolas Barthes, Agathe Labalette, Benoît Lapeyre, Olivier Bonato, Lise Roy

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Efficacy of Liquid Smoke to Mitigate Infestations of the Storage Mite,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  4. High-throughput behavioral phenotyping of tiny arthropods: Chemosensory traits in a mesostigmatic hematophagous mite.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Control ofParasitology · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marine El AdouziCEFE, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, CNRS, Univ Montpellier, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Alfonsina Arriaga-JiménezCEFE, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, CNRS, Univ Montpellier, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1242-7496
Laurent DormontCEFE, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, CNRS, Univ Montpellier, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2021-0625
Nicolas BarthesCEFE, CNRS, Univ Montpellier, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Agathe LabaletteNor-Feed SAS, 3 rue Amedeo Avogadro, 49070 BEAUCOUZÉ, France.
Benoît LapeyreCEFE, CNRS, Univ Montpellier, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Olivier BonatoIRD UMR IPME, 911 avenue Agropolis, BP 64501. 34394 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
Lise RoyCEFE, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, CNRS, Univ Montpellier, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8833-1717
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAgropolis International · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The poultry red mite (PRM) is an obligatory haematophagous pest that causes substantial economic losses in poultry worldwide. The PRM does not live on the host but in the bird's environment and must find its host remotely. Hence, manipulating chicken odours is of interest. Several crude plant-originating volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have already been shown as repellent to Dermanyssus gallinae. We aimed to test whether these VOCs can interfere with PRM host-seeking behaviour by their oral administration to the poultry. The objectives were to determine (1) if hen odours are modified by supplemented feed ingestion and (2) if such treatment makes hens less attractive to the PRM. Chemical characterization by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of the hen odour was conducted before and after the hens ingested the supplemented feed. The chromatograms obtained show that hen odour was substantially modified after the hens consumed it. Among the molecules recurrently detected from the supplemented hens, 26% were nearly absent in the unsupplemented hens. Behavioural choice tests to compare the effect of the modified and unmodified-host odours on the PRM show that some of the plant-originating emitted VOCs and the modified whole-hen odours were repellent to the PRM.

Indexed as

ChickensAcaricidesAnimal FeedAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsFemaleInsect RepellentsMite InfestationsOdorantsPoultry DiseasesTrombiculidaeVolatile Organic CompoundsAcaricidesInsect RepellentsVolatile Organic CompoundsControlhenhost-parasite interactionsin-feedNor-mite®odourrepellentvolatile compounds

Identifiers

PMID31559942
PMCPMC10317670
OpenAlexW2975090063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.