Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31559923›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2020

Endothelial/Mesenchymal Stem Cell Crosstalk Within Bioprinted Cocultures.

Marco Santoro, Tolulope O Awosika, Kirstie L Snodderly, Amelia C Hurley-Novatny, Max J Lerman, John P Fisher

RetractedOpen access · greenAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Vascularization in tissue engineering: fundamentals and state-of-art.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco SantoroFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Tolulope O AwosikaFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Kirstie L SnodderlyFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Amelia C Hurley-NovatnyFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Max J LermanCenter for Engineering Complex Tissues, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
John P FisherFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Training and Dissemination CoreP41EB023833 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2017 to 2021
$6.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB023833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of viable tissue surrogates requires a vascular network that sustains cell metabolism and tissue development. The coculture of endothelial cells (ECs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), the two key players involved in blood vessel formation, has been heralded in tissue engineering (TE) as one of the most promising approaches for scaffold vascularization. However, MSCs may exert both proangiogenic and antiangiogenic role. Furthermore, it is unclear which cell type is responsible for the upregulation of angiogenic pathways observed in EC:MSC cocultures. There is disagreement on the proangiogenic action of MSCs, as they have also been shown to negatively affect the formation of capillary networks. To address these issues, we investigated the regulation of key angiogenic pathways in scaffolds hosting different EC:MSC ratios fabricated through extrusion-based bioprinting. Human ECs were cocultured with either rat or human MSCs, and the regulation of fundamental angiogenic and arteriogenic pathways was analyzed through DNA, gene, and protein expression. The use of a hybrid human/rat coculture system facilitated pinpointing each cell type role in the regulation of specific genes and showed that MSCs exert a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on the EC expression of angiogenic factors within the first 24 h. Within a week of coculture, MSCs exert a proangiogenic effect, as corroborated in human/human bioprinted cocultures. Interestingly, juxtacrine signaling promoted secretion of the angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor in direct cocultures (EC and MSC co-encapsulated), while paracrine signaling encouraged secretion of the arteriogenic factor platelet-derived growth factor in indirect cocultures (adjacent bioprinting of EC-laden and MSC-laden scaffolds). Overall, the use of a bioprinted system to elucidate EC:MSC interplay allows rapid leveraging of the data for novel vascular TE applications. Despite the transitory negative effect early in the culture, MSC presence is necessary for the regulation of pathways involved in arteriogenesis. With further validation

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationEndothelial Progenitor CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsNeovascularization, PhysiologicAnimalsCoculture TechniquesHumansRatsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Abioprintingcoculture modelsendothelial cellsmesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID31559923
PMCPMC8851226
OpenAlexW3037686158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.