ArticleThe British journal of radiology2019
Iodine quantification and detectability thresholds among major dual-energy CT platforms.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Low-Iodine Concentration Quantification Accuracy and Contrast-To-Noise Ratio Across Three Dual-Energy CT Techniques: A Phantom Study.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
- CT-Guided Lung Biopsy Using Dual-Energy Iodine Mapping to Target Lung Masses with Necrotic Tissue-A Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Iodine quantification performance with deep silicon-based Photon-Counting CT: A virtual imaging trial study.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2025Article
- Beyond Conventional CT: Role of Dual-Energy CT in Monitoring Response to Therapy in Abdominal Malignancies.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Review
- What to Expect (and What Not) from Dual-Energy CT Imaging Now and in the Future?Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Pros and Cons of Dual-Energy CT Systems: "One Does Not Fit All".Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
- Detecting lymph node metastasis of esophageal cancer on dual-energy computed tomography.Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 2022Article
- Comparison of virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT and a true non-contrast CT for contouring in radiotherapy of 3D printed lung tumour models in motion: a phantom study.The British journal of radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo estimate the minimum detectable iodine concentration on multiple dual-energy CT (DECT) platforms. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A phantom containing iodine concentrations ranging from 0 to 10 mg ml
results1 mg mL
conclusionsAt low concentrations, CNR for monoenergetic images was highest on the DS platform and lowest in the sequential acquisition and split-filter platforms. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The results of this study corroborate previous
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.