ReviewCurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences2021
Reliably Measuring Cognitive Change in the Era of Chronic HIV Infection and Chronic HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders.
Review in Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in Cerebrospinal Fluid, Liver and Intima-media-thickness Biomarkers in Patients with HIV-associated Neurocognitive Disorders Randomized to a Less Neurotoxic Treatment Regimen.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2023Trial
- Examining Age as Moderating Associations Between Methamphetamine Abstinence and Cognitive Function in People with HIV.Viruses · 2026Article
- α-Synuclein fibrils enhance HIV-1 infection of human T cells, macrophages and microglia.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Meaningful cognitive decline is uncommon in virally suppressed HIV, but sustained impairment, subtle decline and abnormal cognitive aging are not.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- The potential role of HIV-1 latency in promoting neuroinflammation and HIV-1-associated neurocognitive disorder.Trends in immunology · 2022Review
- Altered gray matter structural covariance networks in drug-naïve and treated early HIV-infected individuals.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Complement component 3 and complement factor H protein levels are altered in brain tissues from people with human immunodeficiency virus: A pilot study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Utility of a Short Neuropsychological Protocol for Detecting HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders in Patients with Asymptomatic HIV-1 Infection.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Cumulative Burden of Depression and Neurocognitive Decline Among Persons With HIV: A Longitudinal Study.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
HIV infection has become a chronic disease managed across the life span. In this context, the cognitive health of HIV infection needs to have methods for monitoring over time, in order to better anticipate HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) trajectories in relation to biomarkers, and predict prognosis and especially the risk of dementia as People Living with HIV (PLHIV) age. In this chapter, we critically review several statistical frameworks to quantify cognitive change. We then provide a critical review of naturalistic longitudinal studies and selected randomized clinical trials assessing neurocognitive change as a primary outcome in PLHIV, conducted since the advent of the combined antiretroviral therapy era (censored January 2019). Doing so, we distinguish between PLHIV who were treated early and did not experience AIDS (CDC 1993), versus treated late, after experiencing AIDS and more severe immune compromise. Highlighting strengths and limitations of these studies, we emphasize that issues of reliability pertaining to the use of neuropsychological tests need careful consideration for the robust quantification of cognitive change, including measurement error, practice effect, inter-individual variability, baseline level of functioning, demographic effects, timeframe between testing intervals, normative longitudinal data, and operationalization of clinically meaningful neurocognitive change. In addition, issues pertaining to longitudinal analyses including type, amount and pattern of missing data and/or participant attrition, regression toward the mean, and survivor bias need to be properly addressed. We conclude by proposing future research directions with emphasis on research translation to clinical participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.