ArticleNeurology and therapy2019
Long-Term Observation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Japanese Patients with Pompe Disease: Results From the Post-marketing Surveillance.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of avalglucosidase alfa in Japanese patients with late-onset and infantile-onset Pompe diseases: A case series from clinical trials.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2025Article
- Real-world data of in-hospital administration of alglucosidase alfa in French patients with Pompe disease: results from the National Claims Database.Journal of neurology · 2024Observational
- Efficacy and safety of enzyme replacement therapy with alglucosidase alfa for the treatment of patients with infantile-onset Pompe disease: a systematic review and metanalysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Review
- Long-Term Experience with Anaphylaxis and Desensitization to Alglucosidase Alfa in Pompe Disease.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlglucosidase alfa received marketing approval for the treatment of Pompe disease in Japan in 2007. We conducted a post-marketing surveillance study to monitor the long-term safety and efficacy of alglucosidase alfa therapy among Japanese patients with Pompe disease.
methodsThe safety and efficacy outcomes were collected as real-world data for up to 9 years following the initiation of treatment with alglucosidase alfa, without any intervention to treatment strategies. The safety of the drug was assessed in 73 patients in terms of the rate of drug-related adverse events, infusion-associated reactions, and antibody titers. The efficacy was evaluated in 72 patients on the basis of subjective evaluation of their general condition after treatment, pulmonary function, 6-min walk test, and survival rate.
resultsDrug-related adverse events were observed in 29 of 73 (39.7%) cases, and the cumulative adverse event rate during the 9 years of the study was 45.7%. Immunoglobulin G antibodies against alglucosidase alfa were positive in 59 of 61 cases in which the titers were not correlated with drug-related adverse events or infusion-associated reactions. After the final dosing, the treating physicians determined that the disease was at least stabilized in 62 of 72 cases (86.1%), while the results of the physical function tests suggested that disease progression was actually not stopped completely. Survival of infantile-onset cases was sustained for 9 years.
conclusionThe drug was generally well tolerated, and treatment with alglucosidase alfa was able to suppress disease progression in the majority of Japanese patients with Pompe disease included in this study.
fundingSanofi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.