Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31559582›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2020

Liquid biopsy in oncology: a consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.

J Remon, R García-Campelo, E de Álava, R Vera, J L Rodríguez-Peralto, Á Rodríguez-Lescure, B Bellosillo, P Garrido, F Rojo, R Álvarez-Alegret

Erratum issuedAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. SEOM-GETTHI clinical guideline for the practical management of molecular platforms (2021).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Guideline
  2. SEOM‑GETTHI clinical guideline for the practical management of molecular platforms (update 2026).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Letter to the Editor regarding "Liquid biopsy in oncology: a consensus statement of the Spanish society of pathology and the Spanish society of medical oncology".Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Treatment strategy optimization for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation: a Delphi consensus.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  19. Future Perspectives in DetectingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

J RemonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal Barcelona (CIOCCB), HM Delfos, Barcelona, Spain. jordi.remon@delfos.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9462-875X
R García-CampeloDepartment of Medical Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
E de ÁlavaInstitute of Biomedicine of Sevilla (IBiS), Department of Normal and Pathological Cytology and Histology, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital /CSIC/University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
R VeraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra and Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain.
J L Rodríguez-PeraltoCIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.
Á Rodríguez-LescureDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario de Elche y Vega Baja, Elche, Spain.
B BellosilloCIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.
P GarridoCIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.
F RojoCIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.
R Álvarez-AlegretDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proportion of cancer patients with tumours that harbour a potentially targetable genomic alteration is growing considerably. The diagnosis of these genomic alterations can lead to tailored treatment at the onset of disease or on progression and to obtaining additional predictive information on immunotherapy efficacy. However, in up to 25% of cases, the initial tissue biopsy is inadequate for precision oncology and, in many cases, tumour genomic profiling at progression is not possible due to technical limitations of obtaining new tumour tissue specimens. Efficient diagnostic alternatives are therefore required for molecular stratification, which includes liquid biopsy. This technique enables the evaluation of the tumour genomic profile dynamically and captures intra-patient genomic heterogeneity as well. To date, there are several diagnostic techniques available for use in liquid biopsy, each one of them with different precision and performance levels. The objective of this consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology is to evaluate the viability and effectiveness of the different methodological approaches in liquid biopsy in cancer patients and the potential application of this method to current clinical practice. The experts contributing to this consensus statement agree that, according to current evidence, liquid biopsy is an acceptable alternative to tumour tissue biopsy for the study of biomarkers in various clinical settings. It is therefore important to standardise pre-analytical and analytical procedures, to ensure reproducibility and generate structured and accessible clinical reports. It is essential to appoint multidisciplinary tumour molecular boards to oversee these processes and to enable the most suitable therapeutic decisions for each patient according to the genomic profile.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorConsensusGenomicsHumansLiquid BiopsyMedical OncologyNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineReproducibility of ResultsSpainBiomarkers, TumorctDNAGenomic profilingLiquid biopsyOncologyPrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID31559582
PMCPMC7854395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.