ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2021
Short-term repeatability of myocardial blood flow using
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved myocardial blood flow estimation with residual activity correction and motion correction inEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Trial
- Establishing normal myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve values: a rubidium-82 positron emission tomography study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Optimal image-derived input function models for multi-parameter analysis and acceptably reduced acquisition time in [EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- The impact of fast vs. slow rubidium-82 infusion profile on precision and accuracy of PET myocardial blood flow perfusion metrics using a 1-tissue compartment model.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Detection and correction of patient motion in dynamicJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Myocardial creep and cardiorespiratory motion correction improves diagnostic accuracy of Rubidium-82 cardiac positron emission tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Automated dynamic motion correction improves repeatability and reproducibility of myocardial blood flow quantification with rubidium-82 PET imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery: The role of CZT camera.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Clinical implications of compromisedJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Myocardial flow reserve estimation with contemporary CZT-SPECT andJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Moving forward with motion reduction, detection and correction in cardiac PET.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Sex Differences and Caffeine Impact in Adenosine-Induced Hyperemia.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022Article
- More evidence for adequate test-retest repeatability of myocardial blood flow quantification withJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Optimizing accuracy and precision with motion correction of PET myocardial blood flow measurements.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Myocardial blood flow: Is motion correction necessary?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Quantitative perfusion-CMR is significantly influenced by the placement of the arterial input function.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- 3D PET/CTEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe tested the repeatability of myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantified using
methodsTwenty-one patients referred for clinical
resultsMC with LV-AIF did not change MBF (no MC: 1.01 ± 0.30 mL/min/g vs MC with LV-AIF: 1.01 ± 0.29, P = 0.70), whereas MC with LA-AIF showed significantly lower MBF assessments (0.95 ± 0.28 mL/min/g, P = 0.0006). We report significant improvement for test-retest reproducibility for global MBF following MC (CV; No MC: 16.0, MC (LV-AIF): 9.2, MC (LA-AIF): 8.8). Good inter-operator repeatability was observed for LV-AIF (CV = 4.7) and LA-AIF (CV = 5.6) for global MBF assessments.
conclusionsMC significantly improved the test-retest repeatability between operators and between scans. MBF obtained after MC with LV-AIF were comparable, whereas MBFs after MC and LA-AIF were significantly reduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31559536What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.