Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31559495›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019

The efficacy and toxicity of the CHG priming regimen (low-dose cytarabine, homoharringtonine, and G-CSF) in higher risk MDS patients relapsed or refractory to decitabine.

Cai Xiu, Xiao Li, Lingyun Wu, Feng Xu, Qi He, Zheng Zhang, Dong Wu, Luxi Song, Jiying Su, Liyu Zhou and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cai XiuDepartment of Hematology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Xiao LiDepartment of Hematology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China. lixiao3326@163.com.
Lingyun WuDepartment of Hematology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China. lincy2032@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1050-4774
Feng XuDepartment of Hematology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Qi HeDepartment of Hematology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Zheng ZhangDepartment of Hematology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Dong WuDepartment of Hematology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Luxi SongDepartment of Hematology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Jiying SuDepartment of Hematology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Liyu ZhouDepartment of Hematology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Youshan ZhaoDepartment of Hematology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Ying TaoDepartment of Hematology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Chunkang ChangDepartment of Hematology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81670121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMyelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) refractory or relapsed after hypomethylating agents (HMAs) remain a therapeutic challenge. The CHG regimen has been demonstrated to be effective in initially treating higher risk MDS. The current study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of the CHG regimen in patients who were resistant to decitabine.

methodsPatients with higher risk MDS relapsed or refractory to decitabine were enrolled in this study. Each patient received the CHG regimen (cytarabine (25 mg/day, days 1-14) and homoharringtonine (1 mg/day, days 1-14) intravenously with G-CSF (300 μg/day) subcutaneously from day 0 until neutrophil count recovery to 2.0 × 10

resultsThirty-three patients were enrolled, including 12 relapsed and 21 refractory cases. The overall response rate (ORR) was 39.4% (13 of 33), with 9 (27.3%) achieving complete remission (CR), 2 having marrow CR (mCR), and 2 achieving partial remission (PR). The CR rate was higher in patients harboring fewer gene mutations (0-1) (55.6%) than in those with more gene mutations (> 1) (12.5%) (p = 0.021). The median overall survival (OS) of the 33 patients was 7.0 months. Patients who achieved a response had significantly longer survival times than were found in those without a response (21.0 M vs. 4.0 M, p < 0.0001). The regimen was endurable for most of the patients.

conclusionsThe CHG priming regimen provided a safe and effective salvage regimen for higher risk MDS patients who were resistant to decitabine. Further studies involving larger samples will be needed. Clinical trial No. ChiCTR-ONC-11001501.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCytarabineDecitabineFemaleGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHomoharringtonineHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationMyelodysplastic SyndromesRemission InductionSalvage TherapyTreatment OutcomeCytarabineDecitabineGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHomoharringtonineCytarabineDecitabineGranulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)HomoharringtonineMyelodysplastic syndromes

Identifiers

PMID31559495
PMCPMC11810205
OpenAlexW2976558362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.