ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2019
Pediatric Ocular Myasthenia Gravis.
Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcome and clinical features in juvenile myasthenia gravis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of Plasma Exchange Combined with Immunoglobulin Therapy on Consciousness, Immune Function, and Prognosis in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Crisis: A Prospective Randomized Test.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- Clinical Characteristics and Treatment of Juvenile Myasthenia Gravis-A Single-Center Experience.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWe present a review of current strategies in the treatment of pediatric ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG). A critical appraisal was performed of the current literature available on OMG and the treatment options available for all age populations. From this data, we present the evidence surrounding therapeutic options for pediatric OMG and discuss treatment outcomes in the pediatric population. We also present gaps in the literature with regard to pediatric OMG and possibilities for future research. RECENT
findingsWhile there is data on the use of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents for myasthenia gravis (MG), as a whole it is more specific for the use in generalized juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG) and more focused toward the adult population. In the currently available literature, there have been reports published on the use of steroid-sparing agents including azathioprine, cyclosporine, and mycophenolate mofetil. A recent open-label trial has provided evidence for the use of tacrolimus to improve symptoms of JMG including OMG that were refractory to prednisone. In addition to this, there has been evidence that thymectomy is effective in controlling pediatric OMG and shows a pattern toward preventing generalization of MG, reducing prednisone dosing, and increasing resolution of disease. There are other treatments used in the pediatric population of MG, including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), plasmapheresis, and rituximab, but currently there are no reports on use in OMG. In the population of patients with pediatric OMG, a high percentage of patients are able to obtain stabilization of symptoms using only pyridostigmine or pyridostigmine in combination with oral prednisone. Rates of generalization of OMG range from 15 to 35%, with higher rates in the adolescent population, but approximately 25% of pediatric patients with OMG can have complete remission. For pediatric OMG patients with ophthalmologic manifestations that are refractory to pyridostigmine and prednisone, the use of steroid-sparing agents has been practiced more recently. In addition to this, thymectomy has been utilized in this population. In both of these instances, no pediatric randomized control trials have been performed to date.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.