ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2019
Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery: A pilot study during the introductory period at a local municipal hospital.
Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this pilot study was to confirm the safety and feasibility of the induction of robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery (RRS) at a local municipal hospital. A municipal hospital does not indicate a small hospital. The most significant difference between a municipal hospital and a center or university hospital is that most surgeons in a municipal hospital are general surgeons.
methodsThe first 30 patients who underwent RRS at the municipal hospital were enrolled between April 2015 and June 2016. All surgeries were performed by a single trained surgeon using the da Vinci
resultsOf the study patients, 29 had adenocarcinoma and 1 had ulcerative colitis. The surgical procedures included anterior resection (n = 22), intersphincteric resection (n = 2), abdominoperineal resection (n = 4), Hartmann's procedure (n = 1), and total coloproctectomy (n = 1). There were no intraoperative complications and conversion cases. The median operative time and blood loss were 283.5 min and 9 ml, respectively. The incidence rate of postoperative major complications was 10%, which included anastomotic leakage in 2 patients and ileus in 1 patient. Postoperative urinary dysfunction did not occur in any patient. Complete resection was achieved for all patients.
conclusionsWe demonstrated that the induction of RRS was safe and feasible, even at a local municipal hospital, given that the surgeons had the sufficient skills and experience in both laparoscopic and colorectal surgery. *The study protocol was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000017022).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.