ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2019
Application value of dual-energy computed tomography spectrum curve combined with clinical risk factors in predicting adherent perinephric fat.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of factors predicting adherent perinephric fat in laparoscopic retroperitoenal partial nephrectomy.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Usefulness of the mayo adhesive probability score as a predictive factor for renal function deterioration after partial nephrectomy: a retrospective case-control study.International urology and nephrology · 2021Article
- Mixed reality models based on low-dose computed tomography technology in nephron-sparing surgery are better than models based on normal-dose computed tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- The clinical application value of mixed-reality-assisted surgical navigation for laparoscopic nephrectomy.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdherent perinephric fat (APF) is evaluated preoperatively with the Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) scoring system using conventional single form computed tomography (CT) images. An objective or quantitative indicator for predicting APF is urgently needed for clinical application.
methodsData obtained from 150 renal tumor patients with partial nephrectomy (PN) were used in the present study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical results: an APF group (n=100) and a non-APF group (n=50). All patients had renal contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT (DECT) scan, and the data were brought into a post-processing workstation. Monoenergetic plus mode was adopted to analyze the spectrum curve of the region of interest (ROI). Logistic stepwise relapse investigation was utilized to analyze the related risk factors. The maximum Youden index was taken as the cut-off value. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and 95% CI of the model were calculated.
resultsAPF is related to patients' clinical characteristics of age, gender, BMI, smoking, tumor diameter, exophytic, and benign or malignant nature of the renal masses (P<0.05). The shape of the curve of ROI
conclusionsThe DECT spectrum curve performed well in predicting APF, and the curve slope K can be used as an objective quantitative indicator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.