Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31559161›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2019

CT and MR imaging of the upper extremity vasculature: pearls, pitfalls, and challenges.

Maaz A Ghouri, Nishant Gupta, Ambarish P Bhat, Nanda Deepa Thimmappa, Sachin S Saboo, Ashish Khandelwal, Prashant Nagpal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CT Angiography of the Upper Extremities: Review of Acute Arterial Entities.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maaz A GhouriDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nishant GuptaDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ambarish P BhatDepartment of Radiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Nanda Deepa ThimmappaDepartment of Radiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Sachin S SabooDepartment of Radiology, UT Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Ashish KhandelwalDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Prashant NagpalDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging is needed for diagnosis, treatment planning, and follow-up of patients with pathologies affecting upper extremity vasculature. With growth and evolution of imaging modalities [especially CT angiography (CTA) and MR angiography (MRA)], there is need to recognize the advantages and disadvantages of various modalities and obtain the best possible imaging diagnostic test. Understanding various limitations and pitfalls as well as the best practices to minimize and manage these pitfalls is very important for the diagnosis. This article reviews the upper extremity arterial vascular anatomy, discusses the CTA and MRA imaging, various pitfalls, and challenges and discuss imaging manifestations of upper extremity arterial pathologies.

Indexed as

CT angiography (CTA)ImaginginjuryMR angiography (MRA)thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS)traumaupper extremityvasculitis

Identifiers

PMID31559161
PMCPMC6732118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.