Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31559159›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2019

Preoperative cross-sectional mapping for deep inferior epigastric and profunda artery perforator flaps.

Nanda Thimmappa, Ambarish P Bhat, Kristen Bishop, Prashant Nagpal, Martin R Prince, Sachin S Saboo

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DIEP Flap Preoperative Planning Using Virtual Reality Based on CT Angiography.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nanda ThimmappaDepartment of Radiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Ambarish P BhatDepartment of Radiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Kristen BishopDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Prashant NagpalDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Martin R PrinceDepartment of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Sachin S SabooDepartment of Radiology, UT Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
University of Missouri · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perforator flap-based breast reconstruction in a post mastectomy patient requires dissection of the artery-vein bundle (perforators) responsible for perfusion of the subcutaneous fat and skin of the flap. Traditionally, these reconstructions were performed with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, but autologous breast reconstruction using muscle sparing free flaps has become steadily more popular in recent years. Preoperative imaging to locate and evaluate candidate perforators has become an essential step before patients undergo the microsurgical procedure. Preoperative mapping assists with operative planning, reduces operating times, and brings anatomical variations to their attention. Pre-operative imaging also assists in choosing the appropriate donor site for harvesting flaps. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have been widely used for this type of preoperative imaging. Both MRA and CTA have their inherent advantages and disadvantages, and the preferred modality for this purpose varies by institution based on factors such as scanner availability, radiologist and surgeon experience, and comfort in interpreting the images. Concerns over excessive exposure to ionizing radiation and poor iodinated contrast agent enhancement of the intramuscular perforator course has made MRA the first-choice imaging modality in many centers. The purpose of the article is to review technique and protocols for the pre-operative CTA/MRA in patients who are being considered for a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) or profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap and to familiarize the reader with the normal and variant anatomic features of the deep inferior epigastric and PAP vessels along with the anatomic and surgical considerations used in the selection of perforator flap donor site for breast reconstruction post mastectomy.

Indexed as

autologous breast reconstructiondeep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (DIEP flap)perforator flap angiographyPerforator flap reconstructionprofunda artery perforator flap (PAP flap)

Identifiers

PMID31559159
PMCPMC6732116
OpenAlexW2895888342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.