ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2019
Preoperative cross-sectional mapping for deep inferior epigastric and profunda artery perforator flaps.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Redefining Reconstruction: Technological Innovations in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.Cancers · 2025Review
- Vascular Mapping for Abdominal-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Review of Current and Upcoming Imaging Modalities.Eplasty · 2023Review
- Main factors determining the use of free MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps and comparing the results of breast reconstruction.Journal of medicine and life · 2023Article
- Preoperative Perforator Mapping in DIEP Flaps for Breast Reconstruction. The Impact of New Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Techniques.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Virtual Planning and Mixed Reality for the Thin Anterolateral Thigh Perforator Flap.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Article
- DIEP Flap Preoperative Planning Using Virtual Reality Based on CT Angiography.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Article
- Virtual Planning of Profunda Femoral Artery and Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flaps.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021Article
- Current Endovascular Treatment Options in Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2021Review
- Extraosseous Ewing's Sarcoma: Pictorial Review of Imaging Findings, Differential Diagnosis, and Pathologic Correlation.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2021Article
- Appendiceal diverticulosis in a patient with family history of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome--a case report.Radiology case reports · 2020Article
- Metastatic retro-crural lymph nodes from transitional cell carcinoma of bladder successfully treated with single session cryoablation.Radiology case reports · 2020Article
- Metalophagia: Splenic artery pseudoaneurysm after foreign body ingestion and retrieval.Radiology case reports · 2020Article
- Chemorefractory liver metastasis from cervical cancer successfully treated with a combination of yttrium-90 and immunotherapy.Radiology case reports · 2020Article
- Spontaneous hemorrhage of an adrenal myelolipoma treated with transarterial embolization: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2020Article
- Role of Computed Tomography-guided Biopsies in the Era of Electromagnetic Navigational Bronchoscopy: A Retrospective Study of Factors Predicting Diagnostic Yield in Electromagnetic Navigational Bronchoscopy and Computed Tomography Biopsies.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perforator flap-based breast reconstruction in a post mastectomy patient requires dissection of the artery-vein bundle (perforators) responsible for perfusion of the subcutaneous fat and skin of the flap. Traditionally, these reconstructions were performed with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, but autologous breast reconstruction using muscle sparing free flaps has become steadily more popular in recent years. Preoperative imaging to locate and evaluate candidate perforators has become an essential step before patients undergo the microsurgical procedure. Preoperative mapping assists with operative planning, reduces operating times, and brings anatomical variations to their attention. Pre-operative imaging also assists in choosing the appropriate donor site for harvesting flaps. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have been widely used for this type of preoperative imaging. Both MRA and CTA have their inherent advantages and disadvantages, and the preferred modality for this purpose varies by institution based on factors such as scanner availability, radiologist and surgeon experience, and comfort in interpreting the images. Concerns over excessive exposure to ionizing radiation and poor iodinated contrast agent enhancement of the intramuscular perforator course has made MRA the first-choice imaging modality in many centers. The purpose of the article is to review technique and protocols for the pre-operative CTA/MRA in patients who are being considered for a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) or profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap and to familiarize the reader with the normal and variant anatomic features of the deep inferior epigastric and PAP vessels along with the anatomic and surgical considerations used in the selection of perforator flap donor site for breast reconstruction post mastectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.