Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31559151›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2019

Vascular computed tomography angiography technique and indications.

Vinit Baliyan, Khalid Shaqdan, Sandeep Hedgire, Brian Ghoshhajra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The radiologic spectrum of neuroendocrine tumors in emergent care.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Creating Virtual Models and 3D Movies Using DemoMaker for Anatomical Education.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  19. Imaging Challenges in Chronic Dissection.Seminars in roentgenology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vinit BaliyanDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Khalid ShaqdanDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sandeep HedgireDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Brian GhoshhajraDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive cross-sectional imaging techniques play a crucial role in the assessment of the vascular disease processes. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is an imaging method of choice for a wide range of vascular diseases that span across different vascular territories. A diagnostic quality CTA requires a robust imaging protocol tailored according to the physiologic state and vascular area of interest. This review article is aimed to provide an overview of the technical considerations and clinical applications of CTA.

Indexed as

Computed tomography angiography (CTA)dual energy computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID31559151
PMCPMC6732113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.