Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31559116›Full record

ArticleInternational cancer conference journal2019

Systemic steroid treatment can desensitize the skin reaction due to regorafenib in a recurrence colorectal cancer patient.

Keita Tashiro, Eiji Shinto, Yoshiki Kajiwara, Satsuki Mochizuki, Koichi Okamoto, Aya Nishizawa, Takahiro Satoh, Yoji Kishi, Hideki Ueno

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International cancer conference journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keita Tashiro1Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Namiki3-2, Tokorozawa, Saitama Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4158-2564
Eiji Shinto1Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Namiki3-2, Tokorozawa, Saitama Japan.
Yoshiki Kajiwara1Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Namiki3-2, Tokorozawa, Saitama Japan.
Satsuki Mochizuki1Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Namiki3-2, Tokorozawa, Saitama Japan.
Koichi Okamoto1Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Namiki3-2, Tokorozawa, Saitama Japan.
Aya Nishizawa2Department of Dermatology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Takahiro Satoh2Department of Dermatology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Yoji Kishi1Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Namiki3-2, Tokorozawa, Saitama Japan.
Hideki Ueno1Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Namiki3-2, Tokorozawa, Saitama Japan.
National Defense Medical College Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral intake of regorafenib has been shown to have survival benefits in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on standard therapies. However, because of adverse effects, the patients sometimes cannot continue treatment with regorafenib. Currently, there is no established supportive therapy that can be performed to aid in continuing regorafenib intake under these problematic conditions. We report the case of a 59-year-old Japanese woman diagnosed with recurrence after curative operation for sigmoid colon cancer (T3N2aM0, Stage IIIC). Despite undergoing multiple lines of standard chemotherapy, disease control could not be maintained. Consequently, regorafenib was started as a late-line treatment. However, after 2 weeks, the patient experienced regorafenib-induced serious erythema multiforme; thus, regorafenib was discontinued and oral prednisolone was started. Regorafenib administration was resumed when the adverse effects resolved and prednisolone was stopped, but skin rash rapidly reappeared. Prednisolone treatment was reintroduced, which cured the rash; thus, after the third attempt to administer regorafenib, prednisolone was continuously administered. There was no relapse of the rash under prednisolone administration, and the patient received a total of 13 courses of regorafenib. Moreover, the metastatic lesions that had started to regrow at the end of the regorafenib therapy showed good response to the rechallenge chemotherapy of folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan therapy with panitumumab. The sequence of therapies possibly had a positive impact on the patient's long survival of 30 months after the regorafenib treatment. Systemic administration of steroid is considered as a promising option as a supportive therapy for continuing regorafenib treatment in patients experiencing a severe skin rash.

Indexed as

Continuous steroid intakeErythema multiformeMetastatic colorectal cancerRechallenge chemotherapyRegorafenibSupportive therapy

Identifiers

PMID31559116
PMCPMC6744540
OpenAlexW2946025932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.