ArticleScientific reports2019
Responses of neurons in the rat's inferior colliculus to a sound are affected by another sound in a space-dependent manner.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial separation between two sounds affects first-spike latencies of responses elicited by the sounds in the rat's auditory midbrain neurons.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Spatial-dependent suppressive aftereffect produced by a sound in the rat's inferior colliculus is partially dependent on local inhibition.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The perception of a sound can be influenced by another sound in a space-dependent manner. An understanding of this perceptual phenomenon depends on knowledge about how the spatial relationship between two sounds affects neural responses to the sounds. We used the rat as a model system and equal-probability two-tone sequences as stimuli to evaluate how spatial separation between two asynchronously recurring sounds affected responses to the sounds in midbrain auditory neurons. We found that responses elicited by two tone bursts when they were colocalized at the ear contralateral to the neuron were different from the responses elicited by the same sounds when they were separated with one at the contralateral ear while the other at another location. For neurons with transient sound-driven firing and not responsive to stimulation presented at the ipsilateral ear, the response to a sound with a fixed location at the contralateral ear was enhanced when the second sound was separated. These neurons were likely important for detecting a sound in the presence of a spatially separated competing sound. Our results suggest that mechanisms underlying effects of spatial separation on neural responses to sounds may include adaptation and long-lasting binaural excitatory/inhibitory interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.