Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31558622›Full record

ArticleThorax2019

Susan K Mathai, Stephen Humphries, Jonathan A Kropski, Timothy S Blackwell, Julia Powers, Avram D Walts, Cheryl Markin, Julia Woodward, Jonathan H Chung, Kevin K Brown and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thorax, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Current perspectives on interstitial lung abnormalities.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2019
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Susan K MathaiDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States susan.mathai@bswhealth.org.
Stephen HumphriesDepartment of Radiology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States.
Jonathan A KropskiDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Timothy S BlackwellDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Julia PowersDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
Avram D WaltsDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
Cheryl MarkinDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Julia WoodwardDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
Jonathan H ChungDepartment of Radiology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States.
Kevin K BrownDepartment of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States.
Mark P SteeleDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
James E LoydDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Marvin I SchwarzDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
Tasha FingerlinCenter for Genes, Environment & Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States.
Ivana V YangDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
David A LynchDepartment of Radiology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, United States.
David A SchwartzDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
University of Colorado Denver · USVanderbilt University · USNational Jewish Health · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Familial Pulmonary FibrosisP01HL092870 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHWARTZ, DAVID ALBERT · 2010 to 2020
$21.6M
MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESPIRATORY DISEASES RESEARCH TRAININGT32HL007085 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ELLEN L BURNHAM, LISA A MAIER · 1985 to 2026
$21.6M
Role of Genetics in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)R01HL097163 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI FINGERLIN, TASHA E., SCHWARTZ, DAVID ALBERT · 2009 to 2018
$16.4M
MUC5B, a novel therapeutic target for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)UH3HL123442 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SCHWARTZ, DAVID ALBERT · 2016 to 2018
$4.8M
MUC5B, a novel therapeutic target for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)UH2HL123442 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SCHWARTZ, DAVID ALBERT · 2014 to 2015
$3.0M
Functional Genetics in Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisR33HL120770 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SCHWARTZ, DAVID ALBERT · 2016 to 2018
$1.6M
DNA-Damage Repair In Pulmonary FibrosisK08HL130595 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KROPSKI, JONATHAN ANDREW · 2016 to 2020
$786k
Functional Genetics in Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisR21HL120770 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SCHWARTZ, DAVID ALBERT · 2014 to 2015
$424k
Genomic Profiling of Early Pulmonary FibrosisK23HL136785 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MATHAI, SUSAN K · 2017 to 2017
$186k
Genetic Variants of Desmoplakin and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisF32HL123240 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MATHAI, SUSAN K · 2015 to 2015
$65k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL123240NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL130595NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL136785NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL092870NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL097163NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL120770NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL120770NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007085NHLBI NIH HHS UH2 HL123442NHLBI NIH HHS UH3 HL123442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelatives of patients with familial interstitial pneumonia (FIP) are at increased risk for pulmonary fibrosis. We assessed the prevalence and risk factors for preclinical pulmonary fibrosis (PrePF) in first-degree relatives of patients with FIP and determined the utility of deep learning in detecting PrePF on CT.

methodsFirst-degree relatives of patients with FIP over 40 years of age who believed themselves to be unaffected by pulmonary fibrosis underwent CT scans of the chest. Images were visually reviewed, and a deep learning algorithm was used to quantify lung fibrosis. Genotyping for common idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis risk variants in

findingsIn 494 relatives of patients with FIP from 263 families of patients with FIP, the prevalence of PrePF on visual CT evaluation was 15.6% (95% CI 12.6 to 19.0). Compared with visual CT evaluation, deep learning quantitative CT analysis had 84% sensitivity (95% CI 0.72 to 0.89) and 86% sensitivity (95% CI 0.83 to 0.89) for discriminating subjects with visual PrePF diagnosis. Subjects with PrePF were older (65.9, SD 10.1 years) than subjects without fibrosis (55.8 SD 8.7 years), more likely to be male (49% vs 37%), more likely to have smoked (44% vs 27%) and more likely to have the

interpretationPrePF is common in relatives of patients with FIP. Its prevalence increases with age and the presence of a common

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAgedAlgorithmsColoradoDeep LearningFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansIdiopathic Interstitial PneumoniasIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisMaleMiddle AgedMucin-5BPrevalencePromoter Regions, GeneticRisk FactorsMUC5B protein, humanMucin-5BTelomeraseTERT protein, humanIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisImaging/CT MRI etcInterstitial Fibrosis

Identifiers

PMID31558622
PMCPMC7535073
OpenAlexW2976077191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.