ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2019
EvoChromo: towards a synthesis of chromatin biology and evolution.
Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- What has population genomics told us about the dynamics of selection and plant adaptation?Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Review
- Chromatin enables precise and scalable gene regulation with factors of limited specificity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- The chromatin source-sink hypothesis: a shared mode of chromatin-mediated regulations.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- Meiotic drive of noncentromeric loci in mammalian meiosis II eggs.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2023Review
- Article
- Which field of research would Gregor Mendel choose in the 21st century?The Plant cell · 2022Review
- A phylogenetic and proteomic reconstruction of eukaryotic chromatin evolution.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022Article
- Mechanical Mechanisms of Chromosome Segregation.Cells · 2021Review
- Article
- Physicochemical Foundations of Life that Direct Evolution: Chance and Natural Selection are not Evolutionary Driving Forces.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past few years, interest in chromatin and its evolution has grown. To further advance these interests, we organized a workshop with the support of The Company of Biologists to debate the current state of knowledge regarding the origin and evolution of chromatin. This workshop led to prospective views on the development of a new field of research that we term 'EvoChromo'. In this short Spotlight article, we define the breadth and expected impact of this new area of scientific inquiry on our understanding of both chromatin and evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.