ArticleDisability and health journal2020
Differences among participants' response to a wellness intervention for individuals with spinal cord injuries.
Article in Disability and health journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) often struggle with lifestyle adjustment following injury. Effective wellness interventions may aid in improving quality of life; however, treatment response heterogeneity is a concern for behavioral interventions.
objectiveTo identify differences among adults with SCI who were responders and non-responders in a wellness intervention.
methodsThere were 29 persons with SCI who received a wellness intervention. Participants engaged in six in-person workshops over a 3-month period, led by wellness experts with peer mentors available. Individual intervention participant change was compared to the mean among control group participants target outcomes variables (i.e., satisfaction with life, self-efficacy for health practices, secondary conditions, health promoting behaviors, and perceived stress) to classify responders versus non-responders.
resultsOf the 29 participants, 18 who completed the intervention were classified as responders and 11 were non-responders. The mean age was 43.2 ± 11.2 years, and years post-injury were 12.0 ± 9.8. Decision tree regression analysis for demographic variables and injury characteristics showed that single/divorced participants were more likely to not respond to the intervention (52%), compared to married participants (17%). Further, participants who were single/divorced and ≤50 years old were more likely to not respond to the intervention (62%) than those who were older (25%).
conclusionsSingle/divorced individuals with SCI may respond differently to behavioral wellness interventions than married individuals. Additionally, the effects of age on treatment response in behavioral interventions should be further examined. Identifying non-modifiable factors related to response heterogeneity may help guide the creation of tailored interventions specific to patient characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.