Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31558352›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Contraceptive Use Among Women Veterans Accessing the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

Tierney E Wolgemuth, Maris Cuddeback, Lisa S Callegari, Keri L Rodriguez, Xinhua Zhao, Sonya Borrero

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tierney E WolgemuthUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: tew45@pitt.edu.
Maris CuddebackUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Lisa S CallegariDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Center for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Keri L RodriguezUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Xinhua ZhaoCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Sonya BorreroUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

Examining Contraceptive Use and Unmet Need Among Women VeteransI01HX000908 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI BORRERO, SONYA B. · 2013 to 2015
–
Reproductive Planning for Women VeteransIK2HX001736 · VA · VA PUGET SOUND HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI CALLEGARI, LISA SUSANNE · 2019 to 2020
–
HSRD VA I01 HX000908HSRD VA IK2 HX001736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough many studies evaluate factors influencing contraceptive use, little is known about barriers and facilitators that may be specific to or prevalent among women veterans using the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VA).

designSemistructured telephone interviews with a national sample of 189 women veterans at risk for unintended pregnancy who receive care in the VA were used to explore barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use as well as elicit suggestions for improving VA contraceptive care. The sample consisted primarily of women with risk factors for adverse reproductive health outcomes, including belonging to ethnic/racial minority groups, having a medical or mental health condition(s), and/or reporting a history of military sexual trauma. Transcript narratives were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method.

resultsFive distinct themes emerged as barriers or facilitators to contraceptive use depending on participants' VA facility and provider, and women offered concrete suggestions to address each barrier. Most participants (56%) noted poor efficiency as a barrier; others (39%) felt hindered by limited contraceptive counseling and patient education. Approximately one-third (34%) noted that low patient awareness of services impeded care and another one-third (32%) stressed poor interaction with providers as a barrier. Finally, 31% noted feeling ostracized at VA, and emphasized fostering a woman-friendly environment to remove discomfort associated with seeking contraceptive care.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that, despite widespread access to low-cost contraception, many women veterans experience barriers to accessing high-quality contraceptive care. These barriers are system and provider specific and warrant further internal evaluation.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePregnancy, UnplannedAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorDelivery of Health CareFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyQualitative ResearchUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeteransYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31558352
PMCPMC7197290
OpenAlexW2975312997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.