Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31558150›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2019

Inbreeding depression due to recent and ancient inbreeding in Dutch Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle.

Harmen P Doekes, Roel F Veerkamp, Piter Bijma, Gerben de Jong, Sipke J Hiemstra, Jack J Windig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 217 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic Analysis of Inbreeding Depression on Productive Traits in Rubia Galega Beef Cattle Breed.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Optimising the Use of Cryopreserved Genetic Resources for the Selection and Conservation of Animal Populations.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harmen P DoekesWageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. harmen.doekes@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9359-5941
Roel F VeerkampWageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Piter BijmaWageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Gerben de JongCooperation CRV, Wassenaarweg 20, 6843 NW, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Sipke J HiemstraWageningen University & Research, Centre for Genetic Resources the Netherlands, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jack J WindigWageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLCRV (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality KB-34-013-002H2020 Research and Innovation 677353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInbreeding decreases animal performance (inbreeding depression), but not all inbreeding is expected to be equally harmful. Recent inbreeding is expected to be more harmful than ancient inbreeding, because selection decreases the frequency of deleterious alleles over time. Selection efficiency is increased by inbreeding, a process called purging. Our objective was to investigate effects of recent and ancient inbreeding on yield, fertility and udder health traits in Dutch Holstein-Friesian cows.

methodsIn total, 38,792 first-parity cows were included. Pedigree inbreeding ([Formula: see text]) was computed and 75 k genotype data were used to compute genomic inbreeding, among others based on regions of homozygosity (ROH) in the genome ([Formula: see text]).

resultsInbreeding depression was observed, e.g. a 1% increase in [Formula: see text] was associated with a 36.3 kg (SE = 2.4) decrease in 305-day milk yield, a 0.48 day (SE = 0.15) increase in calving interval and a 0.86 unit (SE = 0.28) increase in somatic cell score for day 150 through to 400. These effects equalled - 0.45, 0.12 and 0.05% of the trait means, respectively. When [Formula: see text] was split into generation-based components, inbreeding on recent generations was more harmful than inbreeding on more distant generations for yield traits. When [Formula: see text] was split into new and ancestral components, based on whether alleles were identical-by-descent for the first time or not, new inbreeding was more harmful than ancestral inbreeding, especially for yield traits. For example, a 1% increase in new inbreeding was associated with a 2.42 kg (SE = 0.41) decrease in 305-day fat yield, compared to a 0.03 kg (SE = 0.71) increase for ancestral inbreeding. There were no clear differences between effects of long ROH (recent inbreeding) and short ROH (ancient inbreeding).

conclusionsInbreeding depression was observed for yield, fertility and udder health traits. For yield traits and based on pedigree, inbreeding on recent generations was more harmful than inbreeding on distant generations and there was evidence of purging. Across all traits, long and short ROH contributed to inbreeding depression. In future work, inbreeding depression and purging should be assessed in more detail at the genomic level, using higher density information and genomic time series.

Indexed as

InbreedingInbreeding DepressionAnimalsCattleFemaleNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID31558150
PMCPMC6764141
OpenAlexW2977036063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.