Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31557983›Full record

ReviewAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland)2015

Taking up Cancer Immunotherapy Challenges: Bispecific Antibodies, the Path Forward?

Joanie Del Bano, Patrick Chames, Daniel Baty, Brigitte Kerfelec

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Bispecific Antibodies in the Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joanie Del BanoInserm, U1068, CRCM, Marseille F-13009, France. joanie.del-bano@inserm.fr.
Patrick ChamesInserm, U1068, CRCM, Marseille F-13009, France. patrick.chames@inserm.fr.
Daniel BatyInserm, U1068, CRCM, Marseille F-13009, France. daniel.baty@inserm.fr.
Brigitte KerfelecInserm, U1068, CRCM, Marseille F-13009, France. brigitte.kerfelec@inserm.fr.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As evidenced by the recent approvals of Removab (EU, Trion Pharma) in 2009 and of Blincyto (US, Amgen) in 2014, the high potential of bispecific antibodies in the field of immuno-oncology is eliciting a renewed interest from pharmaceutical companies. Supported by rapid advances in antibody engineering and the development of several technological platforms such as Triomab or bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs), the "bispecifics" market has increased significantly over the past decade and may occupy a pivotal space in the future. Over 30 bispecific molecules are currently in different stages of clinical trials and more than 70 in preclinical phase. This review focuses on the clinical potential of bispecific antibodies as immune effector cell engagers in the onco-immunotherapy field. We summarize current strategies targeting various immune cells and their clinical interests. Furthermore, perspectives of bispecific antibodies in future clinical developments are addressed.

Indexed as

bispecific antibodycancer immunotherapyimmune effector cellsimmuno-checkpointNK cellsT-cells

Identifiers

PMID31557983
PMCPMC6698871
OpenAlexW2201309545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.