Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31557874›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Standing Desks in a Grade 4 Classroom over the Full School Year.

Sharon Parry, Beatriz Ir de Oliveira, Joanne A McVeigh, Joyln Ee, Angela Jacques, Leon Straker

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Teachers' Perspective on Strategies to Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Educational Institutions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Impacts of a Standing Desk Intervention within an English Primary School Classroom: A Pilot Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sharon ParrySchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth WA 6102, Australia. Sharon.Parry@curtin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3924-3929
Beatriz Ir de OliveiraSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth WA 6102, Australia. Beatriz.Oliveira@curtin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8770-5075
Joanne A McVeighSchool of Occupational Therapy, Curtin University, Speech Therapy and Social Work, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth WA 6102, Australia. Joanne.Mcveigh@curtin.edu.au.
Joyln EeSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth WA 6102, Australia. s.ee3@graduate.curtin.edu.au.
Angela JacquesSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth WA 6102, Australia. Angela.Jacques@curtin.edu.au.
Leon StrakerSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth WA 6102, Australia. L.Straker@curtin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7786-4128

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

School-aged children are spending increasingly long periods of time engaged in sedentary activities such as sitting. Recent school-based studies have examined the intervention effects of introducing standing desks into the classroom in the short and medium term. The aim of this repeated-measures crossover design study was to assess the sit-stand behaviour, waking sedentary time and physical activity, and musculoskeletal discomfort at the start and the end of a full school year following the provision of standing desks into a Grade 4 classroom. Accelerometry and musculoskeletal discomfort were measured in both standing and traditional desk conditions at the start and at the end of the school year. At both time points, when students used a standing desk, there was an increase in standing time (17-26 min/school day) and a reduction in sitting time (17-40 min/school day). There was no significant difference in sit-stand behaviour during school hours or sedentary time and physical activity during waking hours between the start and the end of the school year. Students were less likely to report discomfort in the neck and shoulders when using a standing desk and this finding was consistent over the full school year. The beneficial effects of using a standing desk were maintained over the full school year, after the novelty of using a standing desk had worn off.

Indexed as

ExerciseInterior Design and FurnishingsSchoolsSedentary BehaviorAccelerometryChildCross-Over StudiesHumansMaleSitting PositionStanding PositionStudentschildrenmusculoskeletal discomfortphysical activityschoolsedentary behaviourstanding desks

Identifiers

PMID31557874
PMCPMC6801749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.