ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
An Onsite Calibration Method for MEMS-IMU in Building Mapping Fields.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- UAV Autonomous Localization using Macro-Features Matching with a CAD Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is one of the popular technologies to acquire critical information for building information modelling. To allow an automatic acquirement of building information, the first and most important step of LiDAR technology is to accurately determine the important gesture information that micro electromechanical (MEMS) based inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors can provide from the moving robot. However, during the practical building mapping, serious errors may happen due to the inappropriate installation of a MEMS-IMU. Through this study, we analyzed the different systematic errors, such as biases, scale errors, and axial installation deviation, that happened during the building mapping, based on a robot equipped with MEMS-IMU. Based on this, an error calibration model was developed. The problems of the deviation between the calibrated and horizontal planes were solved by a new sampling method. For this method, the calibrated plane was rotated twice; the gravity acceleration of the six sides of the MEMS-IMU was also calibrated by the practical values, and the whole calibration process was completed after solving developed model based on the least-squares method. Finally, the building mapping was then calibrated based on the error calibration model, and also the Gmapping algorithm. It was indicated from the experiments that the proposed model is useful for the error calibration, which can increase the prediction accuracy of yaw by 1-2° based on MEMS-IMU; the mapping results are more accurate when compared to the previous methods. The research outcomes can provide a practical basis for the construction of the building information modelling model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.