ArticleMutation research2019
ATR kinase inhibition sensitizes quiescent human cells to the lethal effects of cisplatin but increases mutagenesis.
Article in Mutation research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment of human cells with the anti-cancer drug cisplatin results in the caspase-dependent release of adduct-containing cell-free DNA.DNA repair · 2025Article
- Key Proteins of Replication Stress Response and Cell Cycle Control as Cancer Therapy Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Beyond the Double-Strand Breaks: The Role of DNA Repair Proteins in Cancer Stem-Cell Regulation.Cancers · 2021Review
- Pharmacological inhibition of cryptochrome and REV-ERB promotes DNA repair and cell cycle arrest in cisplatin-treated human cells.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Spironolactone and XPB: An Old Drug with a New Molecular Target.Biomolecules · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The ATR protein kinase is known to protect cells from DNA damage induced during the replicative phase of the cell cycle. Small molecule ATR kinase inhibitors have therefore been developed to improve the effectiveness of DNA damage-based chemotherapy regimens aimed at killing rapidly proliferating tumor cells. However, whether ATR functions in a similar manner in non-replicating cells has not been examined and is important considering the fact that most cells in the body, including cancer stem cells in solid tumors, normally reside in either a quiescent or differentiated non-replicating state. Using cultured human cell lines maintained in a quiescent or slowly growing state in vitro, ATR was found to be activated following treatment with the common anti-cancer drug cisplatin in a manner dependent on the nucleotide excision repair (NER) system. Moreover, treatment with the ATR kinase inhibitors VE-821 and AZD6738 enhanced quiescent cell killing and apoptotic signaling induced by cisplatin. However, ATR kinase inhibition in quiescent cells treated with a low concentration of cisplatin also elevated the level of mutagenesis at the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase locus and resulted in increased levels of PCNA mono-ubiquitination. These results suggest that the excision gaps generated by NER may require a greater utilization of potentially mutagenic translesion synthesis polymerases in the absence of ATR kinase function. Thus, though ATR kinase inhibitors can aid in the killing of cisplatin-treated quiescent cells, such treatments may also result in a greater reliance on alternative mutagenic DNA polymerases to complete the repair of cisplatin-DNA adducts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.