ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2019
Preclinical evaluation of exemestane as a novel chemotherapy for gastric cancer.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic reprogramming in colorectal cancer: Mechanisms and therapeutic insights.Genes & diseases · 2027Review
- Comprehensive genetic analysis of poorly differentiated gastric cancer in young females.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
- CYP19A1 Silencing Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Stomach Adenocarcinoma.Oncology research · 2025Article
- Metronomic chemotherapy in cancer treatment: new wine in an old bottle.Theranostics · 2024Review
- Targeting inhibition of prognosis-related lipid metabolism genes including CYP19A1 enhances immunotherapeutic response in colon cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023Article
- Association of plasma lipid metabolism profiles with overall survival for patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy based onNutrition & metabolism · 2023Article
- Identification of the NRF2 transcriptional network as a therapeutic target for trigeminal neuropathic pain.Science advances · 2022Article
- Ursolic acid silences CYP19A1/aromatase to suppress gastric cancer growth.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- The Role of Lipid Metabolism in Gastric Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Inflammation-Related Genes Serve as Prognostic Biomarkers and Involve in Immunosuppressive Microenvironment to Promote Gastric Cancer Progression.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Regulation of aromatase in cancer.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2021Review
- Article
- A transcriptomic study for identifying cardia- and non-cardia-specific gastric cancer prognostic factors using genetic algorithm-based methods.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
- Targeting lipid droplet lysophosphatidylcholine for cisplatin chemotherapy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
- Preclinical evaluation of exemestane as a novel chemotherapy for gastric cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CYP19A1/aromatase (Ar) is a prognostic biomarker of gastric cancer (GCa). Ar is a critical enzyme for converting androstenedione to oestradiol in the steroidogenesis cascade. For decades, Ar has been targeted with Ar inhibitors (ARIs) in gynaecologic malignancies; however, it is unexplored in GCa. A single-cohort tissue microarray examination was conducted to study the association between Ar expression and disease outcome in Asian patients with GCa. The results revealed that Ar was a prognostic promoter. Bioinformatics analyses conducted on a Caucasian-based cDNA microarray databank showed Ar to be positively associated with GCa prognosis for multiple clinical modalities, including surgery, 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) for adjuvant chemotherapy, or HER2 positivity. These findings imply that targeting Ar expression exhibits a potential for fulfilling unmet medical needs. Hence, Ar-targeting compounds were tested, and the results showed that exemestane exhibited superior cancer-suppressing efficacy to other ARIs. In addition, exemestane down-regulated Ar expression. Ablating Ar abundance with short hairpin (sh)Ar could also suppress GCa cell growth, and adding 5-FU could facilitate this effect. Notably, adding oestradiol could not prevent exemestane or shAr effects, implicating a nonenzymatic mechanism of Ar in cancer growth. Regarding translational research, treatment with exemestane alone exhibited tumour suppression efficacy in a dose-dependent manner. Combining subminimal doses of 5-FU and exemestane exerted an excellent tumour suppression effect without influencing bodyweight. This study validated the therapeutic potentials of exemestane in GCa. Combination of metronomic 5-FU and exemestane for GCa therapy is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.