ArticlePloS one2019
Factors restraining the population growth of Varroa destructor in Ethiopian honey bees (Apis mellifera simensis).
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting climate-driven habitat shifts of Varroa destructor using MaxEnt and CMIP6 data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Microbiota diversity and hygienic behavior in a honey bee breeding population: Insights into Varroa resistance.PloS one · 2026Article
- Fending for Thyself: Honey Bees From Ethiopia Inflict Physical Damage onEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Influence of colony and hive attributes, landscape, and seasonality on occurrence of large hive beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Taita Taveta County, Kenya.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Varroa destructor Infestations in Apis mellifera Honeybee Colonies and Associated Risk Factors in Ankasha District, Northwest Ethiopia.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- Honey bee colony losses and causes during the active beekeeping season 2022/2023 in nine Sub-Saharan African countries.PloS one · 2025Article
- Epidemiology, factors influencing prevalence and level of varroosis infestation (Parasite epidemiology and control · 2023Article
- Seasonal Colony Loss Rates and Honey Bee Management in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Results of a Survey of Beekeepers.Insects · 2023Article
- Expression of Molecular Markers of Resilience againstInsects · 2023Article
- Bee Stressors from an Immunological Perspective and Strategies to Improve Bee Health.Veterinary sciences · 2022Review
- Marker assisted selection for Varroa destructor resistance in New Zealand honey bees.PloS one · 2022Article
- A global-scale expert assessment of drivers and risks associated with pollinator decline.Nature ecology & evolution · 2021Article
- Review
- Advances and perspectives in selecting resistance traits against the parasitic mite Varroa destructor in honey bees.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2020Review
- Metagenomic Approach with the NetoVIR Enrichment Protocol Reveals Virus Diversity within Ethiopian Honey Bees (Viruses · 2020Article
- Population abundance of Varroa destructor and its effects on Apis mellifera scutellata colonies in Kenya.Experimental & applied acarology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Worldwide, the ecto-parasitic mite Varroa destructor has been assigned as an important driver of honey bee (Apis mellifera) colony losses. Unlike the subspecies of European origin, the honey bees in some African countries such as Uganda and Ethiopia may not be as threatened or suffer less from mite-infestations. However, only little is known about the factors or traits that enable them to co-exist with the mite without beekeepers' intervention. Hence, this study was designed to investigate these factors or traits that limit the Varroa mite population in Ethiopian honey bees (Apis mellifera simensis). The study was conducted in the primary honey producing region of Ethiopia, i.e. Tigray. Mite infestation levels were shown to be lower in traditional hives (when compared to framed hives) and when colonies were started up from swarm catching (when compared to colony splitting). However, the influence of the comb cell size on mite infestation was not observed. With respect to the bee biology, the hygienic behavior was shown to be high (pin-test: 92.2% removal in 24 hours) and was negatively correlated with phoretic mite counts (Pearson; r = -0.79; P < 0.01) and mite infestation levels in brood (Pearson; r = -0.46; P < 0.001). Efforts to estimate the Varroa mite reproductive capacity were seriously hampered by an extremely low brood infestation level. From the 133 founder mites found (in 6727 capped brood cells) only 18.80% were capable of producing a reproductive progeny. Failure to produce adult male progeny was unexpectedly high (79.70%). We have suggested a few adaptations to the test protocols allowing to estimate the protective traits of honey bee colonies under very low Varroa pressure. Apart from that, this study demonstrates that the honey bees from Ethiopia are suitable targets to further decipher the genetic predisposition of resistance against V. destructor. It is still unclear to what extent simensis differs from the more common scutellata subspecies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.