ArticlePloS one2019
Mapping online hate: A scientometric analysis on research trends and hotspots in research on online hate.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Bias-Based Cyberaggression Related To Origin, Religion, Sexual Orientation, Gender, and Weight: Systematic Review of Young People's Experiences, Risk and Protective Factors, and the Consequences.Trauma, violence & abuse · 2025Pooled it
- Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Listen to Me! Target Perceptions of Digital Hate: A Scoping Review of Recent Research.Trauma, violence & abuse · 2025Article
- Exposure to hate in online and traditional media: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of this exposure on individuals and communities.Campbell systematic reviews · 2025Review
- Exploring Public Emotions on Obesity During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Scientometric analysis of trends in global research on acne treatment.International journal of women's dermatology · 2023Article
- Emerging trends and research foci of deep learning in spine: bibliometric and visualization study.Neurosurgical review · 2023Review
- Hatemongers ride on echo chambers to escalate hate speech diffusion.PNAS nexus · 2023Article
- COVID-19 citation pandemic within the psychological knowledge domain.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Bibliometric analysis of hotspots and frontiers in cancer-related fatigue among ovarian cancer survivors.PloS one · 2022Article
- How many cyberbullying(s)? A non-unitary perspective for offensive online behaviours.PloS one · 2022Article
- Characterizing network dynamics of online hate communities around the COVID-19 pandemic.Applied network science · 2021Article
- Article
- Text-mining forma mentis networks reconstruct public perception of the STEM gender gap in social media.PeerJ. Computer science · 2020Article
- Bots and online hate during the COVID-19 pandemic: case studies in the United States and the Philippines.Journal of computational social science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internet and social media participation open doors to a plethora of positive opportunities for the general public. However, in addition to these positive aspects, digital technology also provides an effective medium for spreading hateful content in the form of cyberbullying, bigotry, hateful ideologies, and harassment of individuals and groups. This research aims to investigate the growing body of online hate research (OHR) by mapping general research indices, prevalent themes of research, research hotspots, and influential stakeholders such as organizations and contributing regions. For this, we use scientometric techniques and collect research papers from the Web of Science core database published through March 2019. We apply a predefined search strategy to retrieve peer-reviewed OHR and analyze the data using CiteSpace software by identifying influential papers, themes of research, and collaborating institutions. Our results show that higher-income countries contribute most to OHR, with Western countries accounting for most of the publications, funded by North American and European funding agencies. We also observed increased research activity post-2005, starting from more than 50 publications to more than 550 in 2018. This applies to a number of publications as well as citations. The hotbeds of OHR focus on cyberbullying, social media platforms, co-morbid mental disorders, and profiling of aggressors and victims. Moreover, we identified four main clusters of OHR: (1) Cyberbullying, (2) Sexual solicitation and intimate partner violence, (3) Deep learning and automation, and (4) Extremist and online hate groups, which highlight the cross-disciplinary and multifaceted nature of OHR as a field of research. The research has implications for researchers and policymakers engaged in OHR and its associated problems for individuals and society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.