Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31557179›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Geographical location influences the composition of the gut microbiota in wild house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) at a fine spatial scale.

Sarah Goertz, Alexandre B de Menezes, Richard J Birtles, Jonathan Fenn, Ann E Lowe, Andrew D C MacColl, Benoit Poulin, Stuart Young, Janette E Bradley, Christopher H Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah GoertzSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Alexandre B de MenezesSchool of Natural Sciences, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Richard J BirtlesSchool of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Jonathan FennSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9255-6975
Ann E LoweSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Andrew D C MacCollSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Benoit PoulinSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Stuart YoungIUCN SSC Asian Wild Cattle Specialist Group, c/o Chester Zoo, Chester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6984-8323
Janette E BradleySchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Christopher H TaylorSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
University of Nottingham · GBChester Zoo · GBOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J014508/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The composition of the mammalian gut microbiota can be influenced by a multitude of environmental variables such as diet and infections. Studies investigating the effect of these variables on gut microbiota composition often sample across multiple separate populations and habitat types. In this study we explore how variation in the gut microbiota of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) on the Isle of May, a small island off the east coast of Scotland, is associated with environmental and biological factors. Our study focuses on the effects of environmental variables, specifically trapping location and surrounding vegetation, as well as the host variables sex, age, body weight and endoparasite infection, on the gut microbiota composition across a fine spatial scale in a freely interbreeding population. We found that differences in gut microbiota composition were significantly associated with the trapping location of the host, even across this small spatial scale. Sex of the host showed a weak association with microbiota composition. Whilst sex and location could be identified as playing an important role in the compositional variation of the gut microbiota, 75% of the variation remains unexplained. Whereas other rodent studies have found associations between gut microbiota composition and age of the host or parasite infections, the present study could not clearly establish these associations. We conclude that fine spatial scales are important when considering gut microbiota composition and investigating differences among individuals.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsEcosystemEnvironmentFemaleGeographyIslandsMaleMiceScotland

Identifiers

PMID31557179
PMCPMC6767902
OpenAlexW2974970903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.