Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31557176›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

An overview of the quality assurance programme for HIV rapid testing in South Africa: Outcome of a 2-year phased implementation of quality assurance program.

Selamawit Alemu Woldesenbet, Mireille Kalou, Dumisani Mhlongo, Tendesayi Kufa, Makhosazana Makhanya, Adeboye Adelekan, Karidia Diallo, Mahlatse Maleka, Beverley Singh, Bharat Parekh and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessment of readiness to transition from antenatal HIV surveillance surveys to PMTCT programme data-based HIV surveillance in South Africa: The 2017 Antenatal Sentinel HIV Survey.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Selamawit Alemu WoldesenbetCenter for HIV and STI, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5023-3561
Mireille KalouInternational Laboratory Branch, Division of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Dumisani MhlongoNational Clinic Laboratory Interface programme, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Tendesayi KufaCenter for HIV and STI, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9797-616X
Makhosazana MakhanyaLaboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Adeboye AdelekanLaboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Karidia DialloLaboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Mahlatse MalekaAcademic Affairs, Research and Quality Assurance National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Beverley SinghCenter for HIV and STI, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Bharat ParekhInternational Laboratory Branch, Division of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Amanda MohlalaStrategic Evaluation, Advisory and Development (SEAD) Consulting, Cape Town, South Africa.
Peter T ManyikeStrategic Evaluation, Advisory and Development (SEAD) Consulting, Cape Town, South Africa.
Tim J TuckerStrategic Evaluation, Advisory and Development (SEAD) Consulting, Cape Town, South Africa.
Adrian J PurenCenter for HIV and STI, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U2G GH001631PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis is the first large-scale assessment of the implementation of HIV Rapid Test Quality Improvement Initiative in South Africa.

methodsWe used a quasi-experimental one group post-test only design. The intervention implemented starting April 2014 comprised health-care worker training on quality assurance (QA) of HIV rapid testing and enrolment of the facilities in proficiency testing (PT), targeting 2,077 healthcare facilities in 32 high HIV burden districts. Following the intervention, two consecutive rounds of site assessments were undertaken. The first, conducted after a median of 7.5 months following the training, included 1,915 facilities that participated in the QA training, while the second, conducted after a median of one-year following the first-round assessment included 517 (27.0%) of the 1,915 facilities. In both assessments, the Stepwise-Process-for-Improving-the-quality-of-HIV-Rapid-Testing (SPI-RT) checklist was used to score facilities' performance in 7 domains: training, physical facility, safety, pre-testing, testing, post-testing and external quality assessment. Facilities' level of readiness for national certification was assessed.

resultBetween 2016 and 2017, there were four PT cycles. PT participation increased from 32.4% (620/1,915) in 2016 to 91.5% (1,753/1,915) in 2017. In each PT cycle, PT results were returned by 76%-87% of facilities and a satisfactory result (>80%) was achieved by ≥95% of facilities. In the SPI-RT assessment, in round-one, 22.3% of facilities were close to or eligible for national certification-this significantly increased to 38.8% in round-two (P-value<0.001). The median SPI-RT score for the domains HIV pre-testing (83.3%) and post-testing (72.2%) remained the same between the two rounds. The median score for the testing domain increased by 5.6% (to 77.8%).

conclusionFacilities performance on the domains that are critical for accuracy of diagnosis (i.e. pre-testing, testing and post-testing) remained largely unchanged. This study provided several recommendations to improve QA implementation in South Africa, including the need to improve routine use of internal quality control for corrective actions.

Indexed as

AIDS SerodiagnosisHIV InfectionsHumansLaboratory Proficiency TestingQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality ControlQuality ImprovementSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID31557176
PMCPMC6762059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.