Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31556232›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

Older persons' experiences regarding evaluation of their medication treatment-An interview study in Sweden.

Malin Holmqvist, Johan Thor, Axel Ros, Linda Johansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Communication Processes Related to Decision-Making in Medication Management Between Healthcare Providers, Older People and Their Carers: A Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Implementation of pharmacotherapy monitoring: Experiences and views of medicine users.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Malin HolmqvistThe School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University and Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3221-9800
Johan ThorJönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, the School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1814-4478
Axel RosJönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, the School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6302-8068
Linda JohanssonInstitute of Gerontology. Aging Research Network-Jönköping, the School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7101-3165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder persons with polypharmacy are at increased risk of harm from medications, and this issue is a global patient safety challenge. Harm may arise at all stages of medication use and may cause hospital admission, additional resource utilization and lower patient satisfaction. Older persons' participation in their own care may increase patient safety. Their views on the evaluation of their medication treatment, and their own involvement in it, are crucial yet poorly understood.

objectivesTo identify opportunities to make the medication use process safer, we explored and described older persons' experiences of evaluation of their medication treatment.

designSemi-structured interviews were performed with 20 community-dwelling older persons (age 75-91 years) in Sweden. Data were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis.

resultsThese older persons reported having a responsibility to engage in their medication evaluations, although some felt unable to do so or considered themselves unconcerned. Evaluation, in their experience, was facilitated by continuity of care and an invitation to participate. However, some older persons experienced not receiving a comprehensive medication evaluation. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionOlder persons want to be actively involved in their medication evaluations, and this may represent an underutilized resource in the pursuit of patient safety. Their trust in physicians to undertake evaluations on a regular basis, although that does not necessarily occur, may cause harm. Patient safety could benefit from a co-production approach to medication evaluations, with health-care professionals explicitly sharing information with older persons and agreeing on responsibilities related to on-going medication treatment.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationAgedAged, 80 and overDrug TherapyFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMedication ReconciliationPolypharmacySwedenattitudeshealth knowledgemedication therapy managementolder adultpatient participationpatient safetypracticequalitative researchquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID31556232
PMCPMC6882295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.