ReviewPituitary2020
Dopamine agonists in prolactinomas: when to withdraw?
Review in Pituitary, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the Role of Intraoperative Prolactin Levels in Surgical Management of Prolactinomas: Predicting Operative Success and Enhancing Surgical Decision-Making.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026Article
- Management for prolactinomas of postmenopausal female patients: a retrospective single-center study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2025Article
- Hormonally Active Pituitary Adenomas and Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Review
- Diagnosis and management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: a Pituitary Society international Consensus Statement.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2023Review
- Current and Perspective Approaches to the Treatment of Prolactinomas.Acta medica Lituanic · 2023Review
- Cabergoline Failure and a Spontaneous Pregnancy in a Microprolactinoma with High Prolactin Levels.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- The side effects of dopamine receptor agonist drugs in Chinese prolactinoma patients: a cross sectional study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2022Article
- Aggressive prolactinoma (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Review
- High biochemical recurrence rate after withdrawal of cabergoline in prolactinomas: is it necessary to restart treatment?Endocrine · 2020Article
- Diagnosis and management of prolactinomas: current challenges.Pituitary · 2020Article
- Prolactinomas: Prognostic Factors of Early Remission After Transsphenoidal Surgery.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dopamine agonists (DAs) are well recognized as the first-line therapy for prolactinomas due to their efficacy in achieving tumoral shrinkage and normoprolactinemia. However, it remains to be established the best timing to withdraw DAs and in which patients this should be attempted. Studies in the 1980s, mainly using bromocriptine, started to defy the concept that DAs should be regarded as a lifelong therapy considering that sustained normoprolactinemia was attained in a small subset of patients after drug withdrawal. The introduction of the more effective agent cabergoline led to an increase in the percentages of remission. The most recent meta-analysis on the topic stated than remission rates after withdrawal can range from 15% in macroprolactinoma patients treated with bromocriptine to 41% in those with microprolactinomas previously treated with cabergoline. When more stringent criteria were applied before attempting withdrawal, sustained remission ensued in more than 50% of the individuals. Treatment duration for more than 24 months, the achievement of normoprolactinemia, marked reduction (≥ 50%) in tumoral size and DAs tapering till a low maintenance dose (e.g. cabergoline 0.5 mg/week) have been the most consistently identified predictors of success. In addition, a growing amount of evidence suggests that the post-pregnancy/breastfeeding period and menopause are reasonable timings to re-access the need for continuing DAs therapy. Considering that the achievement of sustained normoprolactinemia is still far from being universal after the withdrawal, even in highly selected cohorts, future larger prospective studies should continue to address this issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.