Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31555975›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of nutrition2020

Mineral and vitamin intake of infants and young children: the Nutri-Bébé 2013 survey.

Jean-Pierre Chouraqui, Gabriel Tavoularis, Dominique Turck, Constance Ferry, François Feillet

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05649527 (Nutri-Bébé 2022 A French National Survey on Feeding Practice and Nutrient Intakes of Children Under 3 Years of Age), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05649527 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Nutri-Bébé 2022 A French National Survey on Feeding Practice and Nutrient Intakes of Children Under 3 Years of Age

TypeobservationalSponsorSecteur Français des Aliments de l'EnfanceRan2022 to 2022Enrolled1,224ConditionsFeeding Behavior, Nutrients Intakes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jean-Pierre ChouraquiPaediatric Nutrition and Gastroenterology, Medical and Surgical Department of Paediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 21 rue du Bugnon, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. chouraquijp@wanadoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6488-922X
Gabriel TavoularisCREDOC (Centre de Recherche pour l'Etude et l'Observation des Conditions de Vie), 142 rue du Chevaleret, 75013, Paris, France.
Dominique TurckDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Lille University Jeanne de Flandre Children's Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Lille, INSERM U995, 59037, Lille, France.
Constance Ferry, Montigny sur Loing, France.
François FeilletINSERM 1256, Lorraine University, 54000, Nancy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMinerals and vitamins are essential for optimal growth and development, particularly during the first years of life. Therefore, regularly evaluating their intake makes sense. For this purpose, we report the data from the Nutri-Bébé 2013 survey in comparison with the European Food Safety Authority Adequate Intake (AI), or Average Requirement, (AR) according to age.

methodsThis observational, nationally representative, cross-sectional survey was conducted in 1035 non-breastfed French children aged 0.5-35 months. Dietary intake was recorded using a food diary on three non-consecutive days, framed by two face-to-face interviews.

resultsThe intake of zinc, magnesium and water-soluble vitamins most of the time met the recommendations. From the first weeks of life, sodium intake exceeded the AI, with a maximum median intake of 1137 mg/day after the age of 30 months. However, it has decreased since 2005. Calcium median intake often exceeded the AI or AR, reaching a maximum of 780 mg/day between 18 and 23 months. Median vitamin A intake always exceeded the AI or AR but exceeded the recommended upper limit in only a few cases. After 2 years, median iron intake was clearly below the AR, i.e. lower than 6.0 mg/day. Dietary vitamin D intake was below the AI, thereby justifying adequate supplementation. Vitamin E intake was below the AI in 50-75% of toddlers.

conclusionThis survey highlights excessive sodium intake as well as a shortfall of iron, vitamin D, and vitamin E intakes. The potential consequences of these discrepancies with respect to health outcomes remain to be assessed.

Indexed as

Nutrition SurveysChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleFranceHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIronMaleMineralsSodium ChlorideVitamin DVitamin EVitaminsIronMineralsSodium ChlorideVitamin DVitamin EVitaminsInfantsIronMineralsSodiumToddlersVitamins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.