Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31555965›Full record

ArticleFrontiers of medicine2019

Effect of surgical factors on the augmentation of cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw fixation by a novel calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite.

Haolin Sun, Chun Liu, Shunlun Chen, Yanjie Bai, Huilin Yang, Chunde Li, Lei Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers of medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haolin SunDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
Chun LiuOrthopedic Institute, Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Shunlun ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
Yanjie BaiSchool of Public Health, Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215100, China.
Huilin YangOrthopedic Institute, Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Chunde LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China. chundeli@yeah.net.
Lei YangOrthopedic Institute, Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China. ylei@hebut.edu.cn.
Soochow University · CNPeking University · CNPeking University First Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone cement-augmented pedicle screw system demonstrates great efficacy in spinal disease treatments. However, the intrinsic drawbacks associated with clinically used polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement demands for new bone cement formulations. On the basis of our previous studies, a novel injectable and biodegradable calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite (CPN) for the augmentation of pedicle screw fixation was systematically evaluated for its surgical feasibility and biomechanical performance by simulated and animal osteoporotic bone models, and the results were compared with those of clinical PMMA cement. ASTM-standard solid foam and open-cell foam models and decalcified sheep vertebra models were employed to evaluate the augmentation effects of CPN on bone tissue and on the cement-injected cannulated pedicle screws (CICPs) placed in osteoporotic bone. Surgical factors in CICPs application, such as injection force, tapping technique, screw diameter, and pedicle screw loosening scenarios, were studied in comparison with those in PMMA. When directly injected to the solid foam model, CPN revealed an identical augmentation effect to that of PMMA, as shown by the similar compressive strengths (0.73 ± 0.04 MPa for CPN group vs. 0.79 ± 0.02 MPa for PMMA group). The average injection force of CPN at approximately 40-50 N was higher than that of PMMA at approximately 20 N. Although both values are acceptable to surgeons, CPN revealed a more consistent injection force pattern than did PMMA. The dispersing and anti-pullout ability of CPN were not affected by the surgical factors of tapping technique and screw diameter. The axial pullout strength of CPN evaluated by the decalcified sheep vertebra model revealed a similar augmentation level as that of PMMA (1351.6 ± 324.2 N for CPN vs. 1459.7 ± 304.4 N for PMMA). The promising results of CPN clearly suggest its potential for replacing PMMA in CICPs augmentation application and the benefits of further study and development for clinical uses.

Indexed as

Bone CementsPedicle ScrewsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCalcium PhosphatesCompressive StrengthInjectionsMaterials TestingNanocompositesOsteoporosisPolymethyl MethacrylateSheepSpineBone CementsCalcium PhosphatesPolymethyl Methacrylatebone cementcalcium phosphatedegenerative spinal diseasesinjectablepedicle screw

Identifiers

PMID31555965
OpenAlexW2976416108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.