ArticleHerz2021
Relationship between neointimal strut bridge and jailed side-branch ostial area.
Article in Herz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hangover after Side Branch Stenting: The Discomfort Comes Afterwards.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur study analyzed the relationship between the neointimal strut bridge and jailed side-branch (SB) ostial area in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) who had a single drug-eluting stent (DES) crossover of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD)/diagonal branch (D) bifurcation. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 64 CHD patients with an LAD/D bifurcation treated by optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided single-DES implantation and followed up at 1 year after primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI) were enrolled in our study. According to the two-dimensional OCT results, patients were divided into a non-neointimal bridge group (n = 44) and a neointimal bridge group (n = 20). Basic clinical, angiographic, 2D and 3D OCT, and DES results were analyzed.
resultsThe blood lipid levels of the two groups after the 1‑year follow-up were lower than the levels 1 year earlier (p < 0.05). There was a notable decrease in the SB ostial minimum lumen diameter and area directly after pPCI vs. before pPCI in both groups. The diameter stenosis directly after pPCI showed a clear increase compared with the pre-pPCI value in both groups (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01, respectively). The strut distance of the neointimal bridges in the neointimal bridge group was greater than in the non-neointimal bridge group (p < 0.05). A clearly short strut distance of the neointimal bridge was observed compared with the strut distance of the non-neointimal bridge in the neointimal bridge group (p < 0.05). A larger neointimal bridge area and a smaller SB ostial area were found in the neointimal bridge group compared with the non-neointimal bridge group (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01, respectively).
conclusionA short strut distance facilitated formation of a neointimal bridge, which significantly influenced the SB ostial area after single crossover stenting of the SB orifice at the 1‑year follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31555892What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.