ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2019
Stereoacuity measurement using an auto-stereoscopic smartphone.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction on binocularity for myopia with glasses-free 3D technique.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- The eRDS v6 Stereotest and the Vivid Vision Stereo Test: Two New Tests of Stereoscopic Vision.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Assessment of the effects of induced anisometropia on binocularity with glasses-free 3D technique.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Screening for Stereopsis Using an Eye-Tracking Glasses-Free Display in Adults: A Pilot Study.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Rapid, accurate, multifunctional and self-assisted vision assessment and screening with interactive desktop autostereoscopy.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology.Journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- The difference of distance stereoacuity measured with different separating methods.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of having a naked eye 3D glasses-free smartphone is to achieve 3D effects without the need for glasses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether this technology could be utilized to measure stereoacuity.
methodsA 2K auto-stereoscopic smartphone was used to imitate the quantitative section of Random Dot Stereo Acuity Test (contour based symbol) and Random Dot 3 Stereo Acuity Test (random dot based symbol) to measure the stereopsis of subjects.
resultsThere was a high level of agreement between the two methods using Bland-Altman statistical analysis (
conclusionsThe auto-stereoscopic smartphone is a useful tool to evaluate stereopsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.