ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2019
Gotta Trace 'em All: A Mini-Review on Tools and Procedures for Segmenting Single Neurons Toward Deciphering the Structural Connectome.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A modular framework for multi-scale tissue imaging and neuronal segmentation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- From pixels to connections: exploring in vitro neuron reconstruction software for network graph generation.Communications biology · 2024Review
- Between neurons and networks: investigating mesoscale brain connectivity in neurological and psychiatric disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Molecular mapping of neuronal architecture using STORM microscopy and new fluorescent probes for SMLM imaging.Neurophotonics · 2024Article
- nAdder: A scale-space approach for the 3D analysis of neuronal traces.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Blind demixing methods for recovering dense neuronal morphology from barcode imaging data.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Quantitative mapping of keratin networks in 3D.eLife · 2022Article
- Improving the Usability of Virtual Reality Neuron Tracing with Topological Elements.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2021Article
- Automated and semi-automated enhancement, segmentation and tracing of cytoskeletal networks in microscopic images: A review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Article
- Axonal and Dendritic Morphology of Excitatory Neurons in Layer 2/3 Mouse Barrel Cortex Imaged Through Whole-Brain Two-Photon Tomography and Registered to a Digital Brain Atlas.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2021Article
- Dissecting Neuronal Activation on a Brain-Wide Scale With Immediate Early Genes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Review
- Weakly Supervised Learning of 3D Deep Network for Neuron Reconstruction.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2020Article
- A Smart Region-Growing Algorithm for Single-Neuron Segmentation From Confocal and 2-Photon Datasets.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decoding the morphology and physical connections of all the neurons populating a brain is necessary for predicting and studying the relationships between its form and function, as well as for documenting structural abnormalities in neuropathies. Digitizing a complete and high-fidelity map of the mammalian brain at the micro-scale will allow neuroscientists to understand disease, consciousness, and ultimately what it is that makes us humans. The critical obstacle for reaching this goal is the lack of robust and accurate tools able to deal with 3D datasets representing dense-packed cells in their native arrangement within the brain. This obliges neuroscientist to manually identify the neurons populating an acquired digital image stack, a notably time-consuming procedure prone to human bias. Here we review the automatic and semi-automatic algorithms and software for neuron segmentation available in the literature, as well as the metrics purposely designed for their validation, highlighting their strengths and limitations. In this direction, we also briefly introduce the recent advances in tissue clarification that enable significant improvements in both optical access of neural tissue and image stack quality, and which could enable more efficient segmentation approaches. Finally, we discuss new methods and tools for processing tissues and acquiring images at sub-cellular scales, which will require new robust algorithms for identifying neurons and their sub-structures (e.g., spines, thin neurites). This will lead to a more detailed structural map of the brain, taking twenty-first century cellular neuroscience to the next level, i.e., the Structural Connectome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.