Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31555606›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2019

Conceptual Design of a Universal Donor Screening Approach for Vaginal Microbiota Transplant.

Kevin DeLong, Sabrine Bensouda, Fareeha Zulfiqar, Hannah C Zierden, Thuy M Hoang, Alison G Abraham, Jenell S Coleman, Richard A Cone, Patti E Gravitt, Craig W Hendrix and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Management of Recurrent Vaginitis.Current obstetrics and gynecology reports · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Bacterial vaginosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin DeLongThe Center for Nanomedicine, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Sabrine BensoudaThe Center for Nanomedicine, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Fareeha ZulfiqarThe Center for Nanomedicine, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Hannah C ZierdenThe Center for Nanomedicine, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Thuy M HoangThe Center for Nanomedicine, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Alison G AbrahamDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Jenell S ColemanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Richard A ConeDepartment of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Patti E GravittDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Craig W HendrixDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Edward J FuchsDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Charlotte A GaydosDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Ethel D WeldDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Laura M EnsignThe Center for Nanomedicine, The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USGeorge Washington University · US

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR001079 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$60.1M
Inflammation, Vaginal Microbiota, and STI/HIV RiskR01HD092013 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COLEMAN, JENELL S · 2017 to 2020
$2.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001079NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in treating recurrent

Indexed as

AdultDonor SelectionFecal Microbiota TransplantationFemaleHumansLactobacillusMicrobiotaSexually Transmitted DiseasesSurveys and QuestionnairesUrinary Tract InfectionsVaginaVaginosis, BacterialYoung Adultbacterial vaginosis (BV)cervicovaginal secretions (CVS)fecal microbiota transplant (FMT)Lactobacillusmicrobiotasexually transmitted infectionsurinary tract infection (UTI)

Identifiers

PMID31555606
PMCPMC6722226
OpenAlexW2968966670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.