ReviewFrontiers in oncology2019
Monitoring Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: How Molecular Tools May Drive Therapeutic Approaches.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital PCR (dPCR) is able to anticipate the achievement of stable deep molecular response in adult chronic myeloid leukemia patients: results of the DEMONSTRATE study.Annals of hematology · 2025Trial
- One Target, Different Results: The Clinical Impact of Diagnostic Kit Choice inDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Early Assessment of Chemotherapy Response in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Circulating Tumor DNA.Cancers · 2022Article
- Impact of Different Cell Counting Methods in Molecular Monitoring of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The TKI Era in Chronic Leukemias.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Prognostic and predictive biomarker developments in multiple myeloma.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2021Review
- Detection of mutations in CML patients resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitor: imatinib mesylate therapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2021Article
- A Novel System for Semiautomatic Sample Processing in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia: Increasing Throughput without Impacting on Molecular Monitoring at Time of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Clinical relevance of extracellular vesicles in hematological neoplasms: from liquid biopsy to cell biopsy.Leukemia · 2021Review
- Discovery and Protein Modeling Studies of Novel Compound Mutations Causing Resistance to Multiple Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020Article
- Molecular Testing in CML between Old and New Methods: Are We at a Turning Point?Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Prognosis and Therapy: Criticisms and Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Current Landscape and Future Applications With Immunotherapeutic Approaches.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Recent Advances.Cancer management and research · 2020Review
- RT-qPCR versus Digital PCR: How Do They Impact Differently on Clinical Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients?Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More than 15 years ago, imatinib entered into the clinical practice as a "magic bullet"; from that point on, the prognosis of patients affected by chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) became comparable to that of aged-matched healthy subjects. The aims of treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are for complete hematological response after 3 months of treatment, complete cytogenetic response after 6 months, and a reduction of the molecular disease of at least 3 logs after 12 months. Patients who do not reach their goal can switch to another TKI. Thus, the molecular monitoring of response is the main consideration of management of CML patients. Moreover, cases in deep and persistent molecular response can tempt the physician to interrupt treatment, and this "dream" is possible due to the quantitative PCR. After great international effort, today the BCR-ABL1 expression obtained in each laboratory is standardized and expressed as "international scale." This aim has been reached after the establishment of the EUTOS program (in Europe) and the LabNet network (in Italy), the platforms where biologists meet clinicians. In the field of quantitative PCR, the digital PCR is now a new and promising, sensitive and accurate tool. Some authors reported that digital PCR is able to better classify patients in precise "molecular classes," which could lead to a better identification of those cases that will benefit from the interruption of therapy. In addition, digital PCR can be used to identify a point mutation in the ABL1 domain, mutations that are often responsible for the TKI resistance. In the field of resistance, a prominent role is played by the NGS that enables identification of any mutation in ABL1 domain, even at sub-clonal levels. This manuscript reviews how the molecular tools can lead the management of CML patients, focusing on the more recent technical advances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.