Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31555576›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2019

Minimal Residual Disease in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A New Goal?

Ilaria Del Giudice, Sara Raponi, Irene Della Starza, Maria Stefania De Propris, Marzia Cavalli, Lucia Anna De Novi, Luca Vincenzo Cappelli, Caterina Ilari, Luciana Cafforio, Anna Guarini and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Minimal Residual Disease Dynamics after Venetoclax-Obinutuzumab Treatment: Extended Off-Treatment Follow-up From the Randomized CLL14 Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilaria Del GiudiceHematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sara RaponiHematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Irene Della StarzaHematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Maria Stefania De ProprisHematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Marzia CavalliHematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Lucia Anna De NoviHematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Luca Vincenzo CappelliHematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Caterina IlariHematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Luciana CafforioHematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Anna GuariniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Robin FoàHematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), there is a growing interest for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring, due to the availability of drug combinations capable of unprecedented complete clinical responses. The standardized and most commonly applied methods to assess MRD in CLL are based on flow cytometry (FCM) and, to a lesser extent, real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) with allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) primers of immunoglobulin heavy chain genes (IgH). Promising results are being obtained using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and next generation sequencing (NGS)-based approaches, with some advantages and a potential higher sensitivity compared to the standardized methodologies. Plasma cell-free DNA can also be explored as a more precise measure of residual disease from all different compartments, including the lymph nodes. From a clinical point of view, CLL MRD quantification has proven an independent prognostic marker of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after chemoimmunotherapy as well as after allogeneic transplantation. In the era of mechanism-driven drugs, the paradigms of CLL treatment are being revolutionized, challenging the use of chemoimmunotherapy even in first-line. The continuous administration of ibrutinib single agent has led to prolonged PFS and OS in relapsed/refractory and treatment naïve CLL, including those with

Indexed as

chronic lymphocytic leukemiadroplet digital PCRflow cytometryibrutinibminimal residual diseasenext generation sequencingvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID31555576
PMCPMC6727319
OpenAlexW2958355556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.