ArticleCureus2019
Simulator Availability in Meeting the Requirements of United States Army Ophthalmology Individual Critical Task Lists.
Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Individual Critical Task Lists (ICTLs) are a list of requirements set forth by the United States Army which each soldier must fulfill to maintain competency in a specialty. By providing senior leadership objective criteria with which to evaluate the competency of each service member, ICTLs support commanders in ensuring that soldiers are mission ready and deployable. Board-certified ophthalmologists can meet ICTL requirements by demonstrating skills on an actual patient, a simulator, and/or cadaveric or live tissue. We sought to determine the availability of simulators that can be used to meet Army ophthalmology ICTL requirements. Methods We reviewed the current Army ICTLs for ophthalmologists. We performed an online search, as well as an extensive review of Pubmed, AccessMedicine, Academic Search Elite, Thieme, and ScienceDirect, to identify available simulators for each ICTL. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on April 27, 2019. Results Army Ophthalmologists are required to maintain current status in 19 areas based on ICTLs established by the Critical Task Site and Selection Board. Eight of these requirements are not amenable to a simulation of any kind. Of the 11 remaining ICTLs, approximately 82% can be satisfied with a simulator alone based on current simulator availability. The remaining 18% of applicable ICTLs can be satisfied using cadaveric or live tissue training. Conclusions Army ophthalmologists can keep current with their ICTLs, and thus maintain mission readiness, by using either simulators or cadaveric or live tissues. This is particularly important for ophthalmologists who are either located in remote or austere locations without resources or areas with low surgical volumes. Several tasks are applicable to other medical specialties which can benefit from the same simulators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.