Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31555118›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2019

Combining Evolutionary and Adaptive Control Strategies for Quadruped Robotic Locomotion.

Elisa Massi, Lorenzo Vannucci, Ugo Albanese, Marie Claire Capolei, Alexander Vandesompele, Gabriel Urbain, Angelo Maria Sabatini, Joni Dambre, Cecilia Laschi, Silvia Tolu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Brain-inspired biomimetic robot control: a review.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elisa MassiThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Lorenzo VannucciThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Ugo AlbaneseThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Marie Claire CapoleiAutomation and Control Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alexander VandesompeleAIRO, Electronics and Information Systems Department, Ghent University - imec, Ghent, Belgium.
Gabriel UrbainAIRO, Electronics and Information Systems Department, Ghent University - imec, Ghent, Belgium.
Angelo Maria SabatiniAutomation and Control Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Joni DambreThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Cecilia LaschiThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.
Silvia ToluAutomation and Control Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Egidio FaloticoThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In traditional robotics, model-based controllers are usually needed in order to bring a robotic plant to the next desired state, but they present critical issues when the dimensionality of the control problem increases and disturbances from the external environment affect the system behavior, in particular during locomotion tasks. It is generally accepted that the motion control of quadruped animals is performed by neural circuits located in the spinal cord that act as a Central Pattern Generator and can generate appropriate locomotion patterns. This is thought to be the result of evolutionary processes that have optimized this network. On top of this, fine motor control is learned during the lifetime of the animal thanks to the plastic connections of the cerebellum that provide descending corrective inputs. This research aims at understanding and identifying the possible advantages of using learning during an evolution-inspired optimization for finding the best locomotion patterns in a robotic locomotion task. Accordingly, we propose a comparative study between two bio-inspired control architectures for quadruped legged robots where learning takes place either during the evolutionary search or only after that. The evolutionary process is carried out in a simulated environment, on a quadruped legged robot. To verify the possibility of overcoming the reality gap, the performance of both systems has been analyzed by changing the robot dynamics and its interaction with the external environment. Results show better performance metrics for the robotic agent whose locomotion method has been discovered by applying the adaptive module during the evolutionary exploration for the locomotion trajectories. Even when the motion dynamics and the interaction with the environment is altered, the locomotion patterns found on the learning robotic system are more stable, both in the joint and in the task space.

Indexed as

bio-inspired controllercentral pattern generatorcerebellum-inspired algorithmevolutionary algorithmneuroroboticsrobotic locomotion

Identifiers

PMID31555118
PMCPMC6727738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.