Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31555109›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2019

Safety and Feasibility of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation in Patients With Mild or Major Neurocognitive Disorders: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Study.

Takuma Inagawa, Yuma Yokoi, Zui Narita, Kazushi Maruo, Mitsutoshi Okazaki, Kazuyuki Nakagome

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03050385 (COgnitive REhabilitation During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Major or Mild Neurocognitive Disorder Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03050385 nacompletednot on this map

COgnitive REhabilitation During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Major or Mild Neurocognitive Disorder Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, JapanRan2016 to 2017Enrolled20ConditionsTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation, Neurocognitive DisordersArmstranscranial direct current stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Role of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Management of Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-analysis of Effects, Adherence and Adverse Effects.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Takuma InagawaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Center Hospital, Kodaira, Japan.
Yuma YokoiDepartment of Psychiatry, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Center Hospital, Kodaira, Japan.
Zui NaritaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Kazushi MaruoFaculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Mitsutoshi OkazakiDepartment of Psychiatry, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Center Hospital, Kodaira, Japan.
Kazuyuki NakagomeDepartment of Psychiatry, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, National Center Hospital, Kodaira, Japan.
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JPJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a potentially novel strategy for cognitive enhancement in patients with mild or major neurocognitive disorders. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of tDCS during cognitive training on cognitive functioning in patients with mild or major neurocognitive disorders.

methodsThis study was primarily a single arm for safety, secondary a two-arm, parallel, randomized, and sham-controlled trial for potential efficacy. Patients with mild or major neurocognitive disorders were recruited. The participants and raters were blinded to the group assignment. The participants in the active arm received tDCS (anodal; F3, cathodal, Fp2, 2A, 20 min) twice daily for five consecutive days, whereas those in the sham arm received the same amount of sham-tDCS. Calculation and reading tasks were conducted in both arms as a form of cognitive intervention for 20 min during tDCS. The primary outcome was the attrition rate during the trial in the active arm, which is expected to be less than 10%. The secondary outcomes were the between-group differences of adjusted means for several cognitive scales from baseline to post-intervention and follow-up.

resultsTwenty patients [nine women (45%)], with a mean (standard deviation) age of 76.1 years participated; nine patients (45%) with minor neurocognitive disorders and 11 (55%) with major neurocognitive disorders were randomized, and 19 of them completed the trial. The attrition rate in the active arm was 0%, with no serious adverse events. Further, in the Intention-to-Treat analysis, patients in the active arm showed no statistically significant improvement compared with those who received the sham in the mean change scores of the mini-mental state examination [0.41; 95% CI (-1.85; 2.67) at day five, 1.08; 95% CI (-1.31; 3.46) at follow-up] and Alzheimer's disease assessment scale - cognition subscale [1.61; 95% CI (-4.2; 0.98) at day 5, 0.36; 95%CI (-3.19; 2.47) at follow-up].

conclusionThese findings suggest that tDCS is safe and tolerable but causes no statistically significant cognitive effects in patients with mild or major neurocognitive disorders. Additional large-scale, well-designed clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the cognitive effects of tDCS as an augmentation to cognitive training. CLINICAL

trial registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03050385.

Indexed as

cognitive trainingdementiamild cognitive impairmentneurocognitive disordertranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31555109
PMCPMC6742726
OpenAlexW2963806677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.