Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31555060›Full record

ReviewCurrent genomics2019

Overview of Genomic Tools for Circular Visualization in the Next-generation Genomic Sequencing Era.

Alisha Parveen, Sukant Khurana, Abhishek Kumar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. PeerJ. Computer science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alisha Parveen1Medical Research Center, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; 2Pharmacology Department, Central Drug Research Institute - Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India; 3Department of Genetics & Molecular Biology in Botany, Institute of Botany, Christian-Albrechts-University at Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Sukant Khurana1Medical Research Center, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; 2Pharmacology Department, Central Drug Research Institute - Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India; 3Department of Genetics & Molecular Biology in Botany, Institute of Botany, Christian-Albrechts-University at Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Abhishek Kumar1Medical Research Center, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; 2Pharmacology Department, Central Drug Research Institute - Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India; 3Department of Genetics & Molecular Biology in Botany, Institute of Botany, Christian-Albrechts-University at Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After human genome sequencing and rapid changes in genome sequencing methods, we have entered into the era of rapidly accumulating genome-sequencing data. This has derived the development of several types of methods for representing results of genome sequencing data. Circular genome visual-ization tools are also critical in this area as they provide rapid interpretation and simple visualization of overall data. In the last 15 years, we have seen rapid changes in circular visualization tools after the de-velopment of the circos tool with 1-2 tools published per year. Herein we have summarized and revisited all these tools until the third quarter of 2018.

Indexed as

BLAST alignmentCircosCircular visualizationData modelingGenomicsNext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31555060
PMCPMC6728899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.