Your robot surgeon will see you now.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Advances in the management of uveitic cataract: current strategies and emerging perspectives.International ophthalmology · 2025
   Review
2. Evolution and Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Cataract Surgery.Ophthalmology science · 2022
   Article
3. Automation in the fish industry.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2022
   Article
4. Machine learning applications to enhance patient specific care for urologic surgery.World journal of urology · 2022
   Review
5. While the Chatbot's Away, the Mice Will Play.Frontiers in digital health · 2021
   Article
6. Robotics Utilization for Healthcare Digitization in Global COVID-19 Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as