Trial reportEye (London, England)2020
Effect of multiple subconjunctival conbercept injections as an adjuvant to the surgical treatment of pterygium: a prospective randomised comparative 6-month follow-up study.
Trial report in Eye (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents in the treatment of primary pterygium.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Review
- Long-term clinical effects of intravitreal injections of conbercept for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization in patients with pathological myopia.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Subconjunctival injection of mesenchymal stem cells for corneal failure due to limbal stem cell deficiency: state of the art.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of multiple subconjunctival injections of conbercept for pterygium patients after surgery.
methodsAs a prospective randomised interventional trial, 96 eyes from 96 patients with a tendency to recur were collected and divided randomly into conbercept and 5-fluorouracil groups on the 5th day after pterygium. All patients received three subconjunctival injections of conbercept (0.2 ml) or 5-fluorouracil (0.2 ml) on the 5th day (baseline), and 2 and 4 weeks post-operatively. The pterygium morphology, colour intensity, recurrence, and complications were recorded and analysed pre-1st injection and 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-3rd injection. Moreover, no patient was drop-out.
resultsThere were striking differences between the two groups on post-3rd injections 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months (p = 0.001, 0.002, 0.000, 0.000, and 0.002, respectively) with respect to colour intensity: the eyes in conbercept group were lighter than the 5-Fu group. On post-3rd injection 6 months, prominent disparities existed between the two groups with respect to pterygium morphology (p = 0.006) and recurrence (p = 0.002), occurred in the conbercept group prior to the 5-Fu group. Moreover, corneal abrasions were not noted in the conbercept group, which was significantly less than the 5-Fu group (17/48; p = 0.000). There was no conspicuous discrepancy between the two groups with respect to subconjunctival haemorrhage (p = 0.789) and persistent epithelial defects (p = 0.078).
conclusionMultiple subconjunctival conbercept injections as an adjunct therapy for pterygium surgery was shown to be safe, effective, and well-tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.