ArticleScientific reports2019
Association study identified biologically relevant receptor genes with synergistic functions in celiac disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-omics feature engineering driven by biomedical foundation models improves drug response prediction for inflammatory bowel disease patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrative molecular simulations reveal NeuroAid II mechanisms in ischemic stroke through network pharmacology, molecular dynamics, and pharmacophore modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of placental and peripheral blood DNA methylation on celiac disease susceptibility.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025Article
- OR2H2 Activates CAMKKβ-AMPK-Autophagy Signaling Axis and Suppresses Senescence in VK2/E6E7 Cells.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Receptors are essential mediators of cellular physiology, which facilitate molecular and cellular cross-talk with the environment. Nearly 20% of the all known celiac disease (CD) genes are receptors by function. We hypothesized that novel biologically relevant susceptibility receptor genes act in synergy in CD pathogenesis. We attempted to identify novel receptor genes in CD by re-analyzing published Illumina Immunochip dense genotype data for a north Indian and a European (Dutch) cohort. North Indian dataset was screened for 269 known receptor genes. Association statistics for SNPs were considered with minor allele frequency >15% and association P ≤ 0.005 to attend desired study power. Identified markers were tested for cross-ethnic replication in a European CD dataset. Markers were analyzed in-silico to explain their functional significance in CD. Six novel SNPs from MOG (rs29231, p = 1.21e-11), GABBR1 (rs3025643, p = 1.60e-7), OR2H2 (rs1233388, p = 0.0002), ABCF1 (rs9262119, p = 0.0005), ADRA1A (rs10102024, p = 0.003), and ACVR2A (rs7560426, p = 0.004) were identified in north Indians, of which three genes namely, GABBR1 (rs3025643, p = 5.38e-8), OR2H2 (rs1233388, p = 3.29e-5) and ABCF1 (rs9262119, p = 0.0002) were replicated in Dutch. Tissue specific functional annotation, potential epigenetic regulation, co-expression, protein-protein interaction and pathway enrichment analyses indicated differential expression and synergistic function of key genes that could alter cellular homeostasis, ubiquitination mediated phagosome pathway and cellular protein processing to contribute for CD. At present multiple therapeutic compounds/drugs are available targeting GABBR1 and ADRA1A, which could be tested for their effectiveness against CD in controlled drug trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.